Void78

Copy/paste from online Russian English translator: Originally Posted by Chizh Поддержка, планировалась, но не реализована. В частности потому, что такие достаточно мощные ракеты как Р-73 способны вызвать газодинамические проблемы у двигателей (вспомни упавший Ми-28 после пуска НАР). Именно по этому сейчас планируют устанавливать на Ка-52 более легкие ПЗРК Игла. У них выхлоп значительно меньше и есть стартовый, вышибной заряд. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Support, planned but not implemented. In particular, because such sufficiently powerful missiles as the R-73 are able to cause gas-dynamic problems in the engines (remember the fallen Mi-28 after the launch of the NAR). That is why they are now planning to install lighter Igla MANPADS on the Ka-52. They have a much smaller exhaust and have a starting, Bouncing charge. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Originally Posted by Chizh Ну, вот после падения Ми-28 на него внедрили систему охлаждения входящего воздуха водо-спиртовой смесью. Чему вероятно рады технические службы. )) На Ка-50 такого не было. Ну и поскольку вертолет не имел законченного технического лица на момент закрытия программы, то до ракет ВВ руки ни у кого не дошли. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ah, here is after the fall of the Mi-28 on him implemented system cooling incoming air water-alcohol a mixture of. What probably glad of the technical service. )) On the Ka-50 was not like this. Well, since the helicopter did not have a complete technical person at the time of closure of the program, the missiles in the hands of no one reached. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Originally Posted by S.E.Bulba <…> См. обведённое красным цветом на сканах ниже [из книги 2 «Инструкции экипажу вертолёта Ми-24В»] НАР С-5, С-8, С-24Б [стр.26–27] -------------------------------------------------------------------------- See circled in red on the scans below [from book 2 " Instructions to the Mi-24V helicopter crew»] NAR S-5, S-8, S-24B [pp. 26-27]

Haven't played A 10 in a while,but i do remember coming across this issue a few times. If my memory serves me correctly i used to get aln rdy on the hud and GBU-38 could not be released. Was able to fixed it every time by rocking the wings (aln rdy changes to rdy and you are good to go).

:thumbup: Yes i have said so;not directly though. I will switch back to release on Friday i guess. Open beta on JF 17 release..there's that impatience again:pilotfly:

Well it is old news now:P There was a case in Peru in 1988 where guy claimed that he was abducted. Before hes abduction he was taking pictures of some musical band,so he had camera on him,and took the pictures of the UFO that abducted him being pursued by F 14s. Why the heck he did not take any pictures while he was in a craft:doh: Here is the video: Looks like Pedro from Napoleon Dynamite has all grown up:megalol:

No worries.I know better to never assume anything. I have tendency to paint people,and their intentions with much brighter brush. Some of us never learn i guess:doh: Does this mean that if ED decides to update any of the FC3 aircraft i will have to make additional payments in order to play it? Oh...yeah.Never mind:P

You are right of course. But if you don't play multiplayer,i really see no reason to switch from stable to open beta,other than impatience and purchase of the newest module. On the other hand if you use it(open beta),you are helping ED to find and squash bugs by your inputs in the forums as unofficial beta tester. I understand both of your points.

I was not aware that J 11 was a trial plane.I thought it was a gift. Shall we have to pay for Chinese Asset Pack too? My friend once,long ago,has given me a guitar bag. Few years later he was asking it back(trying to gaslight me as it was borrowed to me and not given). Of course,I have gave it back. Needless to say,we were not friends anymore. Unlike my bag situation,things with J 11 are not that clear,but still... Well..thank you for the free trail,but no thank you.

How many white crows do you need to prove that not all crows are black?

Why would anyone change your mind?You like Cobra,and that is it.I would like to see them both(Apache more:P). When F 16 and F 18 are done,ED will work on Mil 24,F 4,AH-1;in that order.So you are getting your Cobra. On the other hand i will never get to see my favorite flying brick MIG 25.

+1 Yeah,MIG 25:bounce:

I mean waypoints in general.B,M...does not matter.When you are configuring release pattern you are telling computer how you wish your ordinance to be released,regardless of what waypoint you have selected,that's all. In your case B4 will select M4(As you have configured B4 to be a target point). You have already setup BK90 wide pattern: After attack on first set of targets at waypoint 4(TGT point-M4), put safety on and master mode to mode NAV. Than you continue with a flight plan and you can change BK90 pattern to long,at any point before attack on a second set of targets located at waypoint 7 (TGT point-M7). -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Of course:thumbup:. You will not get a valid targeting information if that is not the case.

BK 90 pattern is not connected with waypoints in any way(targeting is!!). When you press the trigger programed pattern will be released. Yes,that is correct:thumbup: I configure my weapons after take off,but i don't see any reason why you couldn't configure pattern(or weapons) just after startup(after 9099+LS).So,it is possible-it works;is it recommended?....i can honestly say i do not know. I do assume when you say TGT you are talking about target waypoint(M),and not the individual target.

Yes,it is being evaluated by ED(if i understood correctly). They have send it around three weeks ago.

You can always tell her you have already bought it,or just hide the money.:D On a serious note,i have no idea when we can expect JF 17 to be released. Till end of the year,early next year..not a clue. +1 to OPs question

They would probably hide them.Too many NATO bees. Although their strike aviation may do some damage. Ours certainly did(Tigers of 98.strike regiment using J/22). Anyways,we do not have any eastern block plane in the works,apart from the MIG 23.All i have got to look forward to is Mil 24.

Nope.They will use nukes. My mind does not wonder to those type of conflicts.

All models are welcome...exactly You people are persistent in your intention to not get my point,so i will draw it down for you. How capable aircraft is should not affect decision will it be made in to DCS module or not.

@Mainstay Any Soviet era fighter would be instabuy buy for me. Especially 3rd gen fighters/fighter bombers. They have certain charm in my eyes.

Sunshine,i will be on my horse and there is nothing you can do about it. What is to be cut,is for me to decide,not you. You have gone out of your way to derail the thread,because you don't approve of my point of view. If you had something to say to me personally,there was PM for that. We are done here.

Another Joker. Desert Storm,Iraqi Freedom,Merciful Angel,Libya,Syria..etc. All big mismatches. God forbid if conflict between North Korea and NATO happens; sky would be filled with rust collectors as you have put it. FYI...the term arms race does not apply to third world nations.

Exactly.:thumbup: Yes it is a game.A game that simulates war machines and war as close as possible.I could play I-16 vs F-16 scenario,that is true,but i wouldn't do it because it is not realistic now ..is it? I would fight everyone!!!It is challenging,and above all realistic. So according to you exported variants of MIG 29 shouldn't be made because they would be weak? You have got to be kidding me.

You prefer theirs decision about what? I'm sure after the first Gulf of Sidra incident Libyans thought F 14 is OP. I 16 pilots thought Bf 109 is OP too. This is a study sim,not a multiplayer game.

I think that ED is trying to tell us something. Look at the post #23...:megalol: EDIT:Nvm post was deleted

So what is the problem than? Edit:https://alert5podcast.podbean.com/e/...t-wags-wagner/.....404 error.