Jump to content

jojyrocks

Members
  • Posts

    515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS World Steam edition.

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Thanks! This is resolved. I did not realize the elevation changes and I had to re-adjust, coz when I start these Instant missions and see those things being working fine without me tinkering on the radar especially on elevation and suddenly, as the above image, it goes blank, thought it was a radar bug. But I do wonder if it is normal to have that green "patch" on the scan area, the top part... Anyway, radar works fine.
  2. This is resolved, it has been a while since I stepped into the F-16 module. Thanks!
  3. Same with me, but currently it is for me, only rectified by unchecking at least 2-3 cores from Task Manager affinity selection for DCS. Then it works fine. But without..it is slower and choppy than before, need to wait even on the menu screen a long time, to click. Each time you open DCS, you would need to change the affinity from Task manager. The virus thing was there before the update...The F-14.
  4. F-16XL was a tester prototype, not much data on this than even the F-35. F-18 Super Hornet is more possible.
  5. Same with me, but currently it is for me, only rectified by unchecking at least 2-3 cores from Task Manager affinity selection for DCS. Then it works fine. But without..it is slower and choppy than before, need to wait even on the menu screen a long time, to click. Each time you open DCS, you would need to change the affinity from Task manager.
  6. Another video, same instant mission, Nevada range, AG map radar mode simply does not exist and is blank. F-16 MAP mode radar bug2.trk
  7. This is an Instant mission from Syria map, the track is a bit long. I thought it was somehow solved after seeing the AG radar map mode work ok for some time. Then during the very end parts of the video track, near to the end part, it just blanks out and only when I press the RSET on the AG radar, it does the sweep animation showing the map returns and then, it fizzles out again. Again, I did not need to do any tinkering with the radar it was working fine for some time, just till the near end parts of the video only you could possibly see that AG radar blanks out with some of the green parts in the top edges of the scan range, then I press RSET, and it scan again, showing the sweep. On a side note...with the latest patch DCS is super slow than before, almost slide show level in the menu screen, need to wait to click. This is only so far rectified by unchecking some of the 3 cores from Task manager affinity and it works fine. F-18 MAP mode radar bug2.trk
  8. I do not get the usual F-16 A/G radar map view and it is just blank. F-16 MAP mode radar bug.trk
  9. I only get the radar to get the sweeping animation or the picture when I press RSET, especially on A/G MAP mode and then it stops sweeping. F-18 MAP mode radar bug.trk
  10. If a new revamped Caucasus is built with the new tech, we need to have the option to remove the old. So much potential for this map.
  11. Yeah, that is what I have been parroting about too... Updated current AI models if they cannot even bother to do those cold war era retired red modules. We still have GIMP/PAINT Ai models that just completely kills the immersion feel, and it has been a very long time... I guess we can expect them to be updated in the year 2030 and above...
  12. Along with an extra bug seen using CCRP mode which is useless both for cluster and basic dumb bombs. F-18 FM140 Cluster bomb bug.trk F-18 MK82 Snakeye CCRP test bug.trk
  13. Cluster bomb issue with CBU 99 using FM140 and Mk82 snakeye bomb CCRP usage totally inaccurate on FF and RET. CCRP is useless with both cluster and dumb bombs. F-18 FM140 Cluster bomb bug.trk F-18 MK82 Snakeye CCRP test bug.trk
  14. Ah yes, the Mig 17! Forgot to add that. I feel like I might have missed some others as well...AV-8B, it became operation before somewhere around the very late 80s I think. We need one more at the very least to fit the late 70s and 80s cold war era, fitting perfectly with the current cold war timeline era. If only RAZBAM continued, we'd have that covered with the Mig 23 other than the upcoming Mig 29. But, oh well...loosing the Mig 23 was very big loss. It would have fit in so perfectly. But alas...
×
×
  • Create New...