jojyrocks

Будут ли когда-нибудь эффекты пара в FC3? Я надеялся увидеть эти эффекты в последнем обновлении FC3. Он есть только у МиГ-29.

Will FC3 ever add vapour effects like the Mig 29 FC3 module has?

I was also hoping that they add the vapour effects to almost all FC3 planes like the FC3 Mig 29 has...it feels as though something is missing out.

I was hoping that ED would add some VAPOUR EFFECTS for the all the FC3 planes like they did with the Mig 29...

Mirage f1ee startup bug.trk Or...am I doing something wrong in the steps?

I can engine start the Mirage BE and CE just fine, but the EE version is now not starting up, the engine does not spool. BE and CE starts just fine. I tried this in the Instant missions, cold start missions.

I hope they do the F-104 model that has a gun...it did house the famed M61 Vulcan cannon first...then there is that famed engine howl.

Finally! My dream come true... Now comes the wait...2026 maybe...

I am just emphasizing that it is impossible to that in DCS Hornet. You cannot keep the nose up by modulating the stick with full flaps. It is possible with half flaps. But IRL it is seen being done by these pilots, despite NATOPS SOP, pilots seems to do it, especially in airshows and non Navy users. The emphasis is on the part of "doability"/possibility and not about following NATOPS SOP to the letter when we clearly see here, pilots doing just that, not following the NATOPS to the letter, especially non navy users of these planes, Hornet and the Tomcat. Anyway, its a softer smooth landing without smashing it in when you land in land bases, longer runway. Aerobraking is a skill in itself, to modulate the stick for that smooth braking on ample runways. Weather conditions also matter though...

I voted for F-105 and the AH-1 But I do not think there is much data on F-105 to make a module.

Flare nose up aerobrake touchdown in the F-14 is doable like the Iranians do on runway landing. For USN...only demo pilots seem to do it. Despite NATOPS saying not to...even USN pilots, especially demo pilots do it. In DCS it is possible if you land without cutting power to full idle and just modulate the throttle and pitch after rear wheels touch.

I was only quoting the Hornet coz we see Finnish pilots doing it with their Hornets and even in sometimes we do see even in the Super Hornet doing aerobrake landing by USN pilots. Despite NATOPS manuals saying otherwise, some pilots do this when landing on runways. It is also SUPER hard almost impossible to do a long flare nose up with the Hornet in DCS. But with half flaps it flaring and aerobrake is easy.

Iranians do it and even some USN demo pilots do it and even aerobrake the landing. Finnish air force does it with their Hornets too, flare and aerobrake a bit. In DCS flight modelling on that is a bit off as it is impossible to land with aerobraking on Hornet. With the F14, you need to land with a bit of power to aerobrake on Runway. So, it is possible and doable. Not flaring thing is meant only when you land on carrier.

+1 Hopefully, we'll see this around 2025.

Somewhere down the line, the Super Hornet would be a great addition, any early possible ones, expecting an E version as F version would be just too complicated and time consuming to develop concerning the time phase. If possible, whatever is easier for ED or whichever third party takes this up.

Personally, not much interested in the F-16A unless it comes as a HUGE discount for the current Block 50 F-16 owners, seems more like a downgrade, brings only minimal changes. It simply does not bring the amount of changes like between the Legacy Hornet and the Super Hornet which is actually an upgrade.

Would love to see a GR1A and or GR3A.

What capacity of fuel tanks/Drop tanks did it carry, the options? The cannon armament? Hope it has these to have some emergency self defence weapons if missiles miss...

With their special J-8PP variant itself shows the restrictive nature of Chinese military aircrafts (especially on their avionics) that are still in service... The Su-30MKK seems unlikely...especially with some of it having Chinese avionics. Yes, I know it would sell like hot cakes, I'd more than like this to have been the module, but...restrictions on data regarding avionics can make the Su-30 as module very unlikely. Either way...Su-30 series is the aircraft I sorely wish for DCS to include, maybe one day, it could become a reality.

Maybe difficulty in getting J-8II with the homegrown Chinese avionics and they really did not have much of a choice. Chinese can be very restrictive about their homegrown avionics and hence this adjustment. There are still some J-8II in service as reserve interceptors.

I think there had been some big difficulties in getting the absolute Chinese variant as the Chinese can be very restrictive and secretive about their homegrown avionics. They still use some of these planes as reserve interceptors of sorts. I suppose we can expect this in 2025.

I think it is quite hard for them to get data on the real Chinese homemade avionics, and may have had to make up with this one that has more data access with western avionics.

Yes, Super Etendard would be much more doable than the Rafale which is quite new...

Recorded use in Operation Wooden leg, 1985 on a strike at PLO HQ Tunis. six F-15Ds attacking PLO Headquarters in Tunis with two GBU-15 guided bombs per aircraft and two F-15Cs re-striking the ruins with six Mk-82 unguided bombs each. This was one of the few times air-superiority F-15s (A/B/C/D models) were used in tactical strike missions. Israeli air-superiority F-15 variants have since been extensively upgraded to carry a wider range of air-to-ground armaments, including JDAM GPS-guided bombs and Popeye missiles over the years. Source: Wiki. Israelis modify a lot of their planes from their original versions, like the F-15C US based in service F-15C (vanilla) are not currently configured to carry AG ordnances, they maybe can do it. But they see it much better with it doing air superiority roles and leaving the Derivative two seat Strike Eagles to be the multi role plane.

F-15C does not truly have secondary ground attack ability other than the ability to do a rough or improvised strafe runs. The Israelis are the ONLY ones modified their F-15C and D to be ground attack capable, that is carrying dumb bombs. Real US F-15C only can do improvised rough ground strafe, it is pure air to air configured and designed aircraft. Su-27 and Mig 29 DO have real secondary ground attack ability, they can carry dumb bombs and even UG rockets. Yes, I do really love to see US F-15C as a module. What we have is just the FC3 stuff.