riojax

Look at the altitude warning light. Right eye (all perfect) Left Eye (light without reflection) Tested on latest OB (2.5.5.33552)

Yep, also is terrible when he has the trembling and scared voice when in reality nothing really dangerous is happening. P.S. In spanish the correct word is "cojones", cajones is used for drawers, also you made me my day :lol:

Seems to be a problem managing the VR object deletion near the FOV border. As can see in this video, boats, clouds, missiles, etc. dissapear near the eye border. Also the plane contrail (at 11 from cockpit) dissapear, but unlike the first example, this is only when is near to field vision center and it is tiggered without VR. This video show it: https://streamable.com/fcruq The track is attached, but the view possition in the replay is not the same than the original and the first issue only triggers on VR. P.S. I have a pimax 5k+ without reprojection and masking enabled and i only have this problem in DCS 2.5.5.33184 bug1.trk

I did a mission to protect the Stennis against some Tu-22 armed with X-22 missiles. All is ok but Jester seems to be unable to lock the missiles on TWS, only can lock them in STT and this is unsuitable for these missions. Sadly all recorded tracks seems broken because the plane don't move well on the deck, by that i attach the full mission. def1.miz

When you press A/G DES the diamond moves a bit down and the target isn't designated. P.S. Tested on OB 2.5.5.32533

Hello, Today we had a server crash when someone talked to the Tarawa ATC. This seems similar to this crash but in other .dll: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=242607 DCS OB Version: 2.5.5.32299 2019-06-18 17:59:59.713 INFO EDCORE: try to write dump information 2019-06-18 17:59:59.715 INFO EDCORE: # -------------- 20190618-180000 -------------- 2019-06-18 17:59:59.716 INFO EDCORE: DCS/2.5.5.32299 (x86_64; Windows NT 6.1.7601) 2019-06-18 17:59:59.717 INFO EDCORE: D:\DCS World\bin\WorldGeneral.dll 2019-06-18 17:59:59.718 INFO EDCORE: # C0000005 ACCESS_VIOLATION at ECC6E680 00:00000000 2019-06-18 17:59:59.741 INFO EDCORE: OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1 2019-06-18 18:00:01.619 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000004E680 (WorldGeneral): MovingObject::IsFlag + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.621 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000062ECE (Flight): woATC::sendMessage + 0x5E 2019-06-18 18:00:01.624 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000069F8C (Flight): LSO::updateLSO + 0xACC 2019-06-18 18:00:01.626 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000006159A (Flight): woATC::controlLanding + 0xC3A 2019-06-18 18:00:01.628 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000005FF90 (Flight): woATC::controlTakeoffAndLanding + 0x70 2019-06-18 18:00:01.631 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000000528DE (Flight): woATC::Control + 0x4AE 2019-06-18 18:00:01.633 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000003E06C (Transport): wAirService::controlService + 0x2C 2019-06-18 18:00:01.635 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000003E8FE (Transport): wcColumn::netDestroy + 0x55E 2019-06-18 18:00:01.636 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000002D11 (World): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.639 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000000031DF (World): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.641 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000554352 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.643 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000563AA8 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.645 INFO EDCORE: 0x0000000000536E34 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.648 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000001B012F (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.649 INFO EDCORE: 0x00000000007183D6 (DCS): (function-name not available) + 0x0 2019-06-18 18:00:01.651 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000001652D (kernel32): BaseThreadInitThunk + 0xD 2019-06-18 18:00:01.652 INFO EDCORE: 0x000000000002C521 (ntdll): RtlUserThreadStart + 0x21 2019-06-18 18:00:03.135 INFO EDCORE: Minidump created. dcs.log-20190618-180000.zip

Yeah, and with his tremble and scary voice like if you was on a dangerous and hard situation when you really was trying to land is sad and funny at same time.

Yep, but this also will silent the fuel quantity messages, also is a pain in the ass to do this all time if you don't like the AAR "jokes".

Happened to me yesterday too, in MP without lag. Please, is it possible to add a option in the special menu to disable jester AAR comments? Thank you!

This happened in my dedicated server, it was plenty CPU and RAM but suddenly the tanker (only the tanker) was suffering a hard rubber banding, i checked it on local using F2 and isn't a network issue. At same time i did see theese entries in the log. 2019-04-23 15:59:44.924 INFO DCS: wcTanker::onEvent:10 2019-04-23 15:59:44.924 INFO EDCORE: (wcTanker::Channel)enterToState_:4 2019-04-23 15:59:44.924 INFO DCS: wcTanker::onEvent:8 2019-04-23 15:59:44.924 INFO EDCORE: (wcTanker::Channel)enterToState_:3 2019-04-23 16:00:11.234 INFO DCS: wcTanker::onEvent:1 2019-04-23 16:00:11.234 INFO EDCORE: (wcTanker::Channel)enterToState_:2 2019-04-23 16:01:26.364 INFO DCS: wcTanker::onEvent:6 2019-04-23 16:01:26.364 INFO EDCORE: (wcTanker::Channel)enterToState_:4 2019-04-23 16:01:29.391 INFO DCS: wcTanker::onEvent:9 2019-04-23 16:01:29.391 INFO EDCORE: (wcTanker::Channel)enterToState_:5 2019-04-23 16:01:51.201 INFO DCS: wcTanker::onEvent:10 2019-04-23 16:01:51.201 INFO EDCORE: (wcTanker::Channel)enterToState_:4 2019-04-23 16:01:51.201 INFO DCS: wcTanker::onEvent:8 2019-04-23 16:01:51.201 INFO EDCORE: (wcTanker::Channel)enterToState_:3 Sorry but i haven't a related track and the mission only have a KC-130 and F-18 as client slots.

Hello, this is in my dedicated server, of course it don't have any mods or 3d-party addons or scripts that load f110 sounds (look the grep.txt). The server is fully vanilla, also i attached a track running the mission in my PC and the dcs.log as dcs.txt Thanks on advance, Regards. F16-bug1.trk grep.txt dcs.txt

This is the DCS.LOG error when the AI plane takeoff. 2019-04-21 11:28:12.951 INFO Scripting: event:type=takeoff,initiator=AE_F16_1,place=Sas Al Nakheel Airport,t=43373.91,placeDisplayName=Sas Al Nakheel Airport,initiatorMissionID=1766, 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110rearclose): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110reardistant): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110_front_flyby): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110_side_flyby): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110_rear_flyby): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110rearclose): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110reardistant): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110_front_flyby): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110_side_flyby): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:47.865 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110_rear_flyby): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:48.414 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110enginesidel): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:48.414 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110enginesider): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:48.414 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110enginesidel): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:48.414 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110enginesider): gain 2019-04-21 11:28:49.383 ERROR SOUND: invalid source_params(woLA-16801537:aircrafts\engines\f110afterburnerrearclose): gain

Nice, thank you a lot!! and please, upload a photo if you can/permitted :) Also have on mind that i'm talking about light intensify too, the idea is that now maybe you must to dim TOO much the amber or red light to have the same intensify on the NVG that the green one on normal bright.

Aha, and how do you know it work in reality?

Yep i know it, but i'm talking about the light augmentation by the NVG intensifiers. If you know a bit of physics you will know that the light have different wavelenghts, and the sensor have different sensibilities for every wavelengh. The quid is how really affects the wavelenght of amber (A-10) or red (F-14) to the intensifier and if in DCS are properly implemented. Please, don't talk about anything out this.

I tested the A-10 night amber hud filter too, and i can see the same effect. You can see how's the same in NVG (amber dimmed at max and the green at normal bright) Maybe it's a issue in the NVG shader?

Interesting, it's true that russians uses NUV lighting for night operations because the intensifiers are more sensible to low frequencies, for this the IR and NIR lights are brigther than it must be in reallity. I never used a NVG device in the F-14 cockpit but i doubt that the lighting was too powerfull in IR and NIR to be too bright on NVG, think that the light intensity in the HUD using the red filter is attenuated. Can any real F-14 pilot shed light on this?

It is possible to add a custom cockpit option to allow users to have modified textures and pass the IC in MP servers? This is specially useful for custom cockpits for VR, low VRAM and farsi translations.

bright using a 2.0 gamma?? mmm. I think that your monitor is bad calibrated. The gamma must be always 2.2 in a calibrated display. http://www.lagom.nl/lcd-test/gamma_calibration.php As you can see, the sRGB standard sets the gamma near to 2.2. I recommend you to calibrate your display using this webpage.

I noticed that when you uses the green hud or screen the NVG is a lot less sensitive that when you change it to red. It's supposed to work on the opposite way. This is also noticeable in the white and red flood lights. Also the red instrument and console lights are too sensible to the NVG. I'm not sure that this is a problem related to the F-14 or all ED modules on general but i don't have the means to know it. I attached screenshots showing this behaviour. Thank you on advance, Regards.

I'd use the old serverSettings.lua file to achieve that. Notice the version field and the missing uri and current fields. cfg = { ["listShuffle"] = false, ["isPublic"] = true, ["description"] = "", ["require_pure_textures"] = true, ["version"] = 1, ["missionList"] = { [1] = "C:\\Users\\USERNAME\\Saved Games\\DCS.openbeta\\Missions\\awesome.miz", }, -- end of ["missionList"] ["advanced"] = { ["allow_change_tailno"] = true, ["allow_ownship_export"] = false, ["allow_object_export"] = false, ["pause_on_load"] = false, ["allow_sensor_export"] = false, ["event_Takeoff"] = false, ["pause_without_clients"] = false, ["client_outbound_limit"] = 0, ["client_inbound_limit"] = 0, ["event_Role"] = true, ["allow_change_skin"] = true, ["event_Connect"] = true, ["event_Ejecting"] = false, ["event_Kill"] = true, ["event_Crash"] = true, ["resume_mode"] = 1, ["maxPing"] = 200, }, -- end of ["advanced"] ["require_pure_models"] = true, ["require_pure_clients"] = true, ["name"] = "SERVER TEST", ["port"] = "10308", ["password"] = "", ["listLoop"] = false, ["bind_address"] = "", ["maxPlayers"] = 50, } -- end of cfg

Looking for a good F-14A wallpaper i did see this photo: https://nara.getarchive.net/media/bottom-right-side-view-of-an-f-14-tomcat-aircraft-in-flight-the-aircraft-is-a41dd9 As i can see this is a F-14A using the AGM-45 and this raises two questions. Was the F-14A (and the F-14B) capable to use it? Will be it modeled on the HB module?

Sorry, the ROVER is F-14D only. But the FTI seems to be available on F-14B according to the NAVAIR-01-F14AAP-1 (Figure 1-2)

It is planned to have the AN/AVX-3 full supported on the F-14 module? Also It will be great to have the viewing system placed on a human controlled C2ISTAR truck/soldier and using the CA module be able to view the F-14 output.

+1 Please ED, rework the Mig-15bis cockpit without the fake reflection and a P-51D alike glass. P.S. Meanwhile i'm using this clean cockpit mod: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3302949/