CAPT_Kirkpatrick

And plans change just like that Anyone working with any sort of development project knows things will change on the fly. Better get used to taking everything with a pinch of salt As said above, the rest of us will grin and bear it. Bashing NL, Wags or ED wont get it done any faster.

Not sure if you have tried this; I seem to find i can only set up the failures when cold and dark on the deck (f18) not sure if this is the same thing for you though.

You understand, there probably isn't a manual yet. Mainly because a good few systems are still not implemented. Look at the F-14 release, was in the works publicly for years, we got the manual 2ish months before release The f16 has been in the works "Publicly" for a few weeks; a few months if you count the teaser. The release is in autumn, Have some patience.

That's a nope; ED have repeatedly stated they want to keep the modelling as realistic as possible. This might be stretched between operational and "possible" loadout configs. However asking them to model a missile with no concrete knowledge on its system improvements and adjustments will create a product of pure speculation and is quite simply a bad idea.

There will be a way to add a filter like other jets to filter for friend, SAM, AAA and AI but this is not yet implemented to my knowledge

Can we get your version? (stable current: 2.5.4.29167, Beta Current: 2.5.4.30038) If you are on stable, The JDAMS have not been released for you yet, you'll need to shift to to the beta for them. If you are on the beta, any specifics as to what you are doing would go a long way to solving your problem

As per Wags post a while back we will receive the A and C variation. The A variant works as a long range cluster munition for anti armour/personnel capabilities; useful for destroying static groups of units such as SAM sites or Farps. The C variant has a Hardened penetrator Warhead with IR guidance; Useful against static hardened targets such as Ammo Deports or Hardened Buildings- I'll personally try to use them for anti-Runway if I can get them to do that. The B variant, as stated above, was never actually produced and thus no plans have been announced to add it into our arsenal

Fairly sure that's correct; ON indicated the ALE-47 controls releases, i.e dispense aft and forward start a programmed release BYPASS indicates the release is tied directly to the dispense switch, forward and aft release one flare/chaff respectively.

The limit to the FOV of the seeker may be imposed due to the airframe if mounted on any station other than the wingtip. This is due to the masking of the launch rack and/or airframe

I'm hoping for a fix to the JHMCS so I can go back to looking at my target once I lock them up

Wags stated that the data built from LTWS is not good enough for a weapon launch on any of the targeted units. "It will be important to remember that LTWS has rather poor update for the weapons, so it cannot support a weapons launch" He does say something about the Launch and Steering "L&S" track file, but I am not sure if that even allows for weapons employment

Hi Guys, Quick question for the SA; On the BRA line for target info on the SA page, I only read bearing and range but never altitude. Am i missing something or is the alt info not implemented yet?

As for the issues with spooling up, some online servers spawn you with no fuel. this allows you to spool up but leads to shutdown when the tiny amount of fuel you have is drained I have no help for you on the TrackIR offset unfortunatly.

Did you change the target back to the original target? As far as I am aware, the system automatically cycles the targeted emitter when a HARM is fired and thus you are now attacking two separate targets.