Jump to content

Miguel21

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    952

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Miguel21

  1. Miguel21
    @PB0_CEF ? ^^
  2. Miguel21
    Hi, there, What exactly is the name of the zip? And which server are you connected to? thank you In the meantime, here's the latest version: DCE_Manager_V6.12.38.125.zip null
  3. Miguel21
    nullBefore / after Yes, I think it's a bug DCE_Manager\ASTI The program needs to be able to put back the same number of backslashes but I'm working on it ^^
  4. Miguel21
    the post above has been resolved by updating the version of DCE_Manager. Try it with this one: If the bug persists, can you post me the original files (miz and template) and the final mission (.miz)? thanks
  5. Miguel21
    NG = New generation we've changed the system a bit, but it must be 2 years or more now ^^
  6. Miguel21
    ha, interesting can you push me your basic mission (with the asti prefixes already added) and the template(s)? If possible?
  7. Miguel21
    thanks for these tests, they're great We hadn't thought about the vehicle routes either ^^. So it's normal for there to be inconsistencies, because it's trying to stick its path (certainly) on an existing road. There, I could only put ‘offroad’, I don't see any other solution. The paths are written ‘hard’ in the DCS code, we won't have access to them, apart from the ME.
  8. Miguel21
    Cloning a campaign means you can play the same campaign with several different types of aircraft. Previously, Cef had to offer as many campaigns as aircraft types: Hornet over Caucasus Harrier over Caucasus Tomcat over Caucasus etc... But, basically, it's the same campaign. With this cloning system, Cef offers you 2 variants of the same campaign: WOC-Blue WOC-Red It's then up to you to clone the campaign if you want to WOC-Blue-F-14 WOC-Blue-F18 and so on. It's simpler for us, and more flexible for you.
  9. Miguel21
    Well, we're taking it one step at a time ^^ (sorry) I haven't had time to test it properly, but here's the latest ScriptsMod which should fix that (hopefully it won't break anything else) 481.zip
  10. Miguel21
    Does this version solve the problem? (I don't really believe it, but ) If not, does this bug prevent the rest of the program? DCE_Manager_V6.12.35.119.zip
  11. Miguel21
    so, in SEAD, I suppose the only order they should be given is to attack the SAMs. In Strike, whether or not to jettison the stores is a discussion I've had several times with CEF, and ... we don't agree From his point of view: a Strike flight that is intercepted ‘must’ jettison its stores. The emergency jettison is therefore activated, and I suppose they have the same logic for SAMs.
  12. Miguel21
    Hello access to the Documents\DCE_Manager\log.txt file is blocked or locked by another or old process. so... restart the computer and if it still doesn't work, delete this file, see the DCE_Managere directory
  13. Miguel21
    in SEAD, the package does not have a ground target assigned (as in Strike), so it is normal for this command not to work. On the other hand, it's more surprising that they come back in WPT1. During your flight, do you pass (all together) on this WPT1?
  14. Miguel21
    nice, thanks
  15. Miguel21
    Hello The ‘SEAD’ task has not been modified by DCE, it remains original to DCS. However, I think that IA F4E have trouble with the sead in general.
  16. Miguel21
    Thanks again, And thanks again for the tests. Well, this time we have taken into account the ‘link’, also tried to take into account the orientation of the ship and the names in the dictionary. You can also use the .miz directly as a template (no need to transform it) Having said that, to make sure it works, also name the template's ship group ‘REF_’. However, I haven't been able to do any testing, and my regular tester (Cef^^) won't be around for a few weeks.
  17. Miguel21
    I rewrite the part to take into account the old name (Dickey_) and I realize that I could not recover everything, indeed, it seems that when you pass from the file .miz to the template, part of the original names disappear
  18. Miguel21
    \Init\conf_mod.lua file --***miscellaneous options*** chapter null
  19. Miguel21
    can you try this version, and tell me if the problems with the decimal separator have been fixed? (save init) DCE_Manager_V6.12.35.113.zip
  20. Miguel21
    ha, last thing you can do (it was a request like that, I'd forgotten) cheat_Mod_Eye = true,
  21. Miguel21
    in fact, as long as I haven't made any changes to the DCE_Manager, you shouldn't use it to save the oob. you only need to do this with a text editor, directly on the \Init\oob_air_init.lua file. in the conf_mod file, check that you have this: [‘optionsView’] = ‘optview_all’, if not, send me your generated .miz file
  22. Miguel21
    @Pande4360 concerning the WOB campaign in MP and the request for escort type tasks only (SEAD...) without a MAIN type request (Strike...), I found an interesting approach (from my point of view ^^) But I need a bit of time to make sure it works. In the meantime, if you're in a hurry, deactivate the other F-16 squad, and possibly the B-52s.
  23. Miguel21
    Before: ["Anti-ship Strike"] = 0.5, After: ["Anti-ship Strike"] = 0,5, it's a problem with the decimal separator. I think I'll be able to sort it out Thanks
  24. Miguel21
    Hi, there, can you give me more details, I can't reproduce the bug. I understand that it is on the campaign: ‘War over Beirut-Blue’. I modify one or two numbers, one or two unit activations in Init/blue, but I don't have this bug. What is the sequence of your actions? By the way, can you provide me with the two files? \Active\oob_air.lua and \Init\oob_air_init.lua I'm afraid that the dot characters ‘.’ is replaced by a comma ‘,’ in the numerical variables.
  25. Miguel21
    Hi, there, In fact, ASTI was mainly created to import large static sets where dynamic (simple) elements can be associated with them. (something that the DCS mission editor does very badly). So it's true that we don't know how to import complex dynamic elements (such as aircraft with flight plans, aircraft carriers with associated aircraft, etc.) for the simple reason that the mission editor already does this very well. Renaming elements and groups is mandatory. If the user decides to import the same template 3 times, the names must be changed. DCS does not support duplicate group.name, unit.name, groupId and unitId. However, it's clear that I haven't taken into account the old DCS naming, I'll look into it. In your case, the template calls the Dickey library, so it will call [‘DictKey_UnitName_7’] = ‘Roosevelt’, I'll look into it, thanks for your feedback PS: for the aircraft/static elements placed on an aircraft carrier, I hadn't planned that either, I'll check with Cef whether we're looking at that or not. Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
×
×
  • Create New...