Jump to content

Tallguy

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS
  1. Here also running with .129, pitool @2 an PD in DCS @2. Running quite smooth!
  2. There are already some topics about DCS with Pimax in the 'virtual reality' subforum.
  3. Without any more information, nobody can (easily( answer that question. Any mods running? What settings Pitool? What setting in DCS....etc.....
  4. I have the same issue: most of the times I'm at 50-60% fuel and my AI wingman calls BINGO fuel. Even at the F-14 mission "protect the Viksburg" where we fly at around 850kts.
  5. Yes it should since the shader mod replaces files in your DCS folder. So it's not dependent on what kind of VR goggles you have.
  6. Yes I interpreted it that way. True, HT is requesting a bit more voltage, but not double.
  7. Not quite, since HT isn't helpfull in DCS to be used, but apart from this: most 9900K OC'ers report running at about 1,35v, even lower! So...saying dat double the threads require that much more voltage isn't correct.
  8. Whut? :huh: I have a 9700k running at 5.1 @1,248v. Why is your voltage that high?
  9. Latest update: I was able to get the 9700K up to 5,1Ghz quite easily and also OC'ed my GTX1080 again. In DCS I can run almost everything at high settings. Right now I'm running PD1.8 with MSAAA 2x and AF at 8x and get about 60-80fps on the Caucasus map in a F-15 (I use the Shaders mod btw) I can see that the 1080 is constantly at 100% while the CPU sits comfortably at 21-25% load. Next I'll await the Pimax 5K+ and see how it performs, especially since they keep updating Pitool with some nice features such as Brainwarp. In the meantime I'll keep monitoring the 2080Ti prices (hopefully they'll start dropping soon :) )
  10. :megalol: I haven't tried DCS yet (only started it to see if it would start at all :smilewink: Right now I'm testing my 9700K running at 5,1Ghz :D
  11. My preliminary findings so far (haven't installed the Rift yet) Did some benchmarks with the i7-2600K, 16GB DDR3 RAM, Sata SSD and the GTX1080 (slightly OC'ed) before upgrading. Passmark's results: - Rating: 4641,4 - CPU 8490,6 - 2D Graphics : 790,3 - 3D Graphics : 12809,5 - Memory : 2402,2 - Disk: 5240,9 VRMark Orange Room: 7672 3DMark: 6047 Then changed to an i7-9700K with 32GB 3200Mhz RAM, Z390 motherbord, 2x NVMe Evo 970 500GB and the same GTX1080 (not OC'ed this time) Passmark's results: - Rating: 8250,6 - CPU 19046,8 - 2D Graphics : 1147,1 - 3D Graphics : 14303 - Memory : 3830,8 - Disk: 25916,9 VRMark Orange Room: 12442 3DMark: 7732 The overall performance increase is quite visible (doubling of the CPU score, 1,5x 2D increase, almost no increase in the 3D area according to Passmark) and a 4,5x increase in diskperformance. VRMark, which simulates VR (as the name suggests) shows an 1,6x increase. So...my guess is that the card is almost stretched out concerning it's performance now. Maybe a OC will give me a bit more. Next: get the Rift installed and do some DCS :) As far as I've read, I might get some visual enhancements at a higher level than before...with the exception of MSAA since that'll kill DCS in VR.
×
×
  • Create New...