BranchPrediction

All cpus are different, his can do 5.2ghz and that other guys can only 4.9ghz at the exact same settings. But for overcloking u want to mess around with the voltage, load line calibration and the multiplier. Btw u made a mistake in ur signature. U wrote i7 9900k but its i9 9900k :)

Cool dburne. Ur system is quite a beast. 9900k at 5.2 ghz darn. Is H150i really enough for that OC?

I doubt that the 3080ti will have anywhere near 8000 cuda cores. I think that 8096 cores rumour is for the datacenter. I mean 8000 cores is above 120 CU's

Did ur card die?

I agree with Fri13. Kamov arent idiots, they knew themselves that the ka50 bort 25 is not a 'finished' product. It makes sense to me that kamov would have developed the ka50 a lot more than the ka50 bort 25 that we have.

No worries, thx for info.

Does vulkan use more vram?

As far as we know, and we know little, it never existed.

Ah yes SkateZilla, the legendary 7970, the gcn 1.0 architecture was the best there was back then. 7970 can game well even today. And they have good overclocking potential aswell. Truly legendary cards.

Well i myself also play other games. And with the new remaster of that certain high graphics game that i cannot name coming out soon, i will have to upgrade my gpu. But 1200€ i will not pay. I would like to own the top card for once, but i just cannot pay 1000 to 1200 euros :(

Rdna 2 will be competing with the 30 series, not turing. And this is just great, we need competition.

Only 100 to 200 more cuda cores? If that is so then it will lose against rdna2. Or maybe the performance will come from a better architecture. Ray tracing is cool, turing just isnt good at it. Id love to see cockpit global illumination and reflections beiglng ray traced. Like in the huey u have green tinted glass above the pilots, but in dcs u dont see light being colored green by that glass.

And not to mention that the 20 series cards were dying. Remember those 'UFO' artifacts xD. 1000€ card and it just works/dies. Noice nvidia, noice.

Imo the black shark is the best module in the game. Its really really good. Amazing sounds, amazing cockpit and systems. Truly a beast.

3000! Holy shxt. 3000 for the pc alone? U can build a better gaming pc for less than 3000$. Is building a pc urself and with help from someone not possible for you?

Good setup. But just out of curiosity, how much does it cost?

U think the top cards will get 16gb? I hope amd does an HBM2 or HBM2E card. But that would almost certainly cost atleast a thousand.

VR is connected via cable. Ur buying the best gaming cpu but then ur not buying the best gaming graphics card. Not a very good choiche imo. Ur buying a prebuilt so it may be hard to find one but if ur gonna play VR then i would think a 2080ti is a must. There are new cpus and gpus coming later this year and or early next year. But maybe for prebuilts u will have to wait even longer. I recommend u build ur own pc, maybe get a friend to build it for u or something. In any case good luck.

Pci 3 is still enough though. But just maybe the top cards will benefit from pci e 4. I doubt it tho.

Is it really vram clocked too high? Why did AMD clock it up so high?

right, i agree with CL30. i7 9700K has 8 cores and while more cores can be usefull it is more expensive. i5 9600k and a r5 3600 are both 6 cores and a good price.

xD hahah. Must be nice to be rich tho, shiiit. Just buying the best there is. Damn. My whole pc cost 1030ish euros. 2080ti price xD.

Its a huge problem imo. 1200€ for just a graphics card! If i told my family i bought a single component for a pc for 1200€ they would really think that im retarded xD. I actually have high hopes for big navi. The leaks are really impressive and to top it off amd themselves said 50% improvement in performance per watt. Remember amd is not trying to beat the turing series with rdna 2 but its trying to compete with the rtx 3000 series. Rdna 2 is rumoured to have upto 80 CU's and it clocks higher than 2.23ghz according to sony. Thats almost 24 tflops! But i think if amd's top card beats nvidia's top card, then nvidia will just screw over its costumers and release an even bigger die in a new graphics card. The same as with the 1070ti (vega56 being better than a 1070) and with the 2060S and 2070S (after navi being better than 2060 and 2070). In any case, we need competition, and we dont need loud mouthed fanboys. Im not implying u are btw.

Since were talking about the navi drivers from amd. Hardware unboxed, a youtube channel, did a survey about the new driver from amd that supposedly fixed the issues. 35% people said they had no issues to begin with, 45% said that the new drivers fixed their issues and 20% said they still have issues. U can fact check these numbers on their youtube channel. And it probably only got better ever since that survey. Navi is fantastic performance for a good price. On nvidia's side, 17% had issues ATLEAST AT SOME POINT in its lifetime. The 17% is different from amd's 20% because were talking about having had issues ATLEAST AT SOME POINT in its lifetime. And turing cards died at launch with the 'ufo' artifacts. In any case hope that made sense. Cheers

Ur welcome