Jump to content

combatace

Members
  • Posts

    1374
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by combatace

  1. But I use ATI and I can see the nose. Are you not able to see the nose in the file that I mail you too?
  2. I have not used specular map but have put specular limit to 250 and gloss to 85 but map still remains diffuse one.
  3. [/url] how come you too are not getting its nose? Whats happening with my models you are not getting the nose see here he is having his problem of missiles shining like radium.
  4. I don't know what to, it took me days to complete this model and now I cannot release it. any help guys??
  5. No Tom that is not the problem. I already have different names for both the texture I even stripped off UVs and material and re-added them but get same results.
  6. I made a R-77 model and made a new texture for it, but not what is happening in the game is that this R-77 model is wrapping the texture of my R-27ER model. can I get some help here??
  7. Yes because I edited it.
  8. You don't have to worry about those tiny things they will just take the body's plain texture. and if you want lom file it is already on lockonfiles.
  9. UVW map of ET sent. R-77 on its way.
  10. used the download button in operations column.
  11. Thanks that you were not of those people have their head hot for others using their art. and for UVW map, I would have surely given it to you but I already set it to your present texture and many people have already downloaded it. I will surely seek your help when my R-27ET/R/T are ready.
  12. vertices:1934 polygons:1816 edges:3682 texture:1 texture size:1024 converted to 2048 and sharpened.
  13. Please download again there was a problem that I just fixed. A thousand apologies to all who have already downloaded it.
  14. I uploaded this model on Lockonfiles.com. here is the link http://www.lockonfiles.com//index.php?/files/file/1663-r-27er-high-poly-model/
  15. Got them after a long search. I've been looking on that page but somehow my eyes didn't set on it.
  16. Is there any high resolution skin for R-27ER?
  17. Move to the latest drivers 10.10c that will fix it.
  18. Oh come on! There are a lot of things done in favor of F-15 and Aim-120 and everybody know so don't digress and stick to your topic.
  19. Go in the controls/axis commands menu in game, select thrust in joystick column. Now first clear whatever is preset which might be fs_slider1 and set it to joy_slider1.
  20. Ya if they want to change then they should have a face known for actions movies. Fox lost to her attitude.
  21. Megan Fox in not on the list of transformers 3 and Rosie Huntington-Whiteley is nowhere near her. Man I watched those movies for her. Well I like whole movies though.
  22. Beware you went in the depths of seas where no soul has, You have passed the line that no soul has. You might have seen the world of dark and the stepped the door of vice. You have bathed yourself in murky waters and only one thing thing can cleanse you, FLY FLY and FLY DCS:Warthog and you will be as pure as every noble soul on earth. P.S. If I infringed your emotions.
  23. I moved back from 10.10 to 10.9 and I feel a bit more comfortable now.
  24. Week ago I bought 5750 after my 4670 died and what I found is I have very bad performance of 5750 over 4670. I got 45 fps at 3000mtrs and now I barely get 18-35. The most astonishing part is 10000mtrs I get 50 fps but plunges down to 8-9 intermittently this even happens at low altitudes too where it dips to 5-6fps.
  25. Than for that they will have to go down the ladder rather than climbing up. There are a lot of things ED has put in new in A-10C so there is no way they will do it. So the only thing will happen is patch Ka-50. But as I said in one of my posts in other topics ED has released its A-10C beta in DX9 so if they what to move to dx11 in their future products they will again have to to patch Ka-50 and A-10C. What I suggest is make a more advance game engine which can endure its reign at least till 6-7 products of DCS-series. In that way ED will not have to patch every old product to make it compatible with new one, coz they already be having the same technology. But if ED chooses to make DCS series in an evolving way than they will have to waste time in patching their all old products, which seems tedious to me. So what I think is that the final patch which will come for A-10C should be so advance in its features that its engine can directly be used directly for all new coming products of DCs-series.
×
×
  • Create New...