marcus4hire Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Hi All, As I discover the realism in P-51 I come up with more questions and the desire to try things I have come across in all sorts of books, narratives, videos, and the like. Currently, I am interested in the landing known as a 'fighter approach'. At least, that is what I know it as. In several places (gosh, I can't recall which) I have come across that term. All I know about it is that it exists and is different from the standard approach, used with warbirds and similar aircraft. When I have read about it is usually something like, ".......used a fighter approach when landing....." or, ".....practiced the fighter approach...." Other than that, nothing. Do any of you have an idea what it entails exactly? Is it what is modeled in the sim tutorial or something completely different? Advantages/disadvantages? I am GUESSING that it is sharp turn into final with limited time in the last bit of the approach, culminating with a stall right at the edge of the runway. However, this is a total guess and what I have put together reading memoirs and the like from combat pilots, speaking of how hot shot pilots would do this when landing. But, I dunno if it is a fighter approach. Curious to try it out and hear what you guys think....
Telomere Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 I haven't heard of a "fighter approach" specifically, but it may be something similar to the Overhead Break, which is a landing approach manoeuvre designed to limit the amount of time for which the aircraft is vulnerable (low & slow). There's a video of someone demonstrating how it's done in the A-10C here:
dok_rp Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 I might add a little to the discussion too. There's another kind of approach which the C-17 is very famous for. It's called Tactical Approach, and it involves coming straight for a very high final. At the last moment all engines are reversed and the aircraft simply plunges out of the sky. It's extremely cool to watch. Check this video out ==> Cheers!! :pilotfly:
Pman Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 (edited) A fighter approach to my understanding and what we do is burn in straight and level over the runway about 100ft off the deck, pitch up to break and turn it into a 180 deg turn to put you on downwind. Then as your pass the end of the intended touch down point turn base then curve into finals and touch almost as your wings go level to bring you onto runway heading. The amount of time you spend on finals gliding to the runway is about 2-5 seconds on a good turn in and about 10 on a long one. I can do a video if you want an example? Pman edit, found one I did a while back for a demo Edited April 12, 2014 by Pman
159th_Viper Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Do this, substituting the T-Toad for a Mustang: dk7IbRseqbA Novice or Veteran looking for an alternative MP career? Click me to commence your Journey of Pillage and Plunder! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] '....And when I get to Heaven, to St Peter I will tell.... One more Soldier reporting Sir, I've served my time in Hell......'
marcus4hire Posted April 12, 2014 Author Posted April 12, 2014 Awesome gentlemen!! So it turns out what I was thought a fighter approach might be and what it is is pretty much the same thing. For some reason, I think that is just the neatest looking thing. Generally speaking.......the Mustang loses lift (stalls) right when you roll wings level, in a perfect world?? Thanks for answering the question.
Pman Posted April 12, 2014 Posted April 12, 2014 Awesome gentlemen!! So it turns out what I was thought a fighter approach might be and what it is is pretty much the same thing. For some reason, I think that is just the neatest looking thing. Generally speaking.......the Mustang loses lift (stalls) right when you roll wings level, in a perfect world?? Thanks for answering the question. Dont think its a case of stalling, more just a case of putting it on the deck, in my landing above I two wheel land it so I hadn't stalled but still a quick touch down :) Pman
Freelansir Posted April 13, 2014 Posted April 13, 2014 Have a look here also: http://trainers.hitechcreations.com/combatlanding/combatlanding.htm
marcus4hire Posted April 15, 2014 Author Posted April 15, 2014 Have a look here also: http://trainers.hitechcreations.com/combatlanding/combatlanding.htm That, and the above posts, are exactly what I was looking for! In particular, I came back to ask those exact questions about altitude, distance, power, etc. Fooling around, I darn near had it (well, I did set it down0 on the first try. But, beginner's luck. Couldn't touch it after that. I'll try it tomorrow. Done flying for the night. At 6 hours and 43 minutes into P-51 I logged my first Dora kill!! With full realism settings (is there really anything less?) Totally stoked!! 1
SimFreak Posted April 17, 2014 Posted April 17, 2014 Never heard of that terminology. Usually it's called "initial" or "overhead" http://www.cannonaviation.com/overhead_pattern.php It can be done in any aircraft...nothing to do with "fighter".
marcus4hire Posted April 26, 2014 Author Posted April 26, 2014 Never heard of that terminology. Usually it's called "initial" or "overhead" http://www.cannonaviation.com/overhead_pattern.php It can be done in any aircraft...nothing to do with "fighter". That is a very interesting link. I'll have to study it as well. I can say that the only times I have seen it referred to as 'the fighter approach' was in articles about current day pilots learning to fly war birds.
marcus4hire Posted April 26, 2014 Author Posted April 26, 2014 Never heard of that terminology. Usually it's called "initial" or "overhead" http://www.cannonaviation.com/overhead_pattern.php It can be done in any aircraft...nothing to do with "fighter". That is a very interesting link. I'll have to study it as well. I can say that the only times I have seen it referred to as 'the fighter approach' was in articles about current day pilots learning to fly war birds.
marcus4hire Posted April 26, 2014 Author Posted April 26, 2014 Never heard of that terminology. Usually it's called "initial" or "overhead" http://www.cannonaviation.com/overhead_pattern.php It can be done in any aircraft...nothing to do with "fighter". That is a very interesting link. I'll have to study it as well. I can say that the only times I have seen it referred to as 'the fighter approach' was in articles about current day pilots learning to fly war birds.
[DBS]TH0R Posted April 27, 2014 Posted April 27, 2014 (edited) Also known as the "overhead break" maneuver. The landing part of it, so called "combat version", is similar to the curved carrier approach developed by Royal Navy for corsair carrier operation. Edited April 27, 2014 by T}{OR P8Z68 | 2500k @ 4.5 | GTX 1080Ti | 2x8 GB @ 1600 | TM Hog (extended 7cm) & MFG Crosswind (S/N 007) | TIR v5 WWII bomber formations | DCS P-51D: [TEST] TO distance / gross weight / temperature
marcus4hire Posted April 29, 2014 Author Posted April 29, 2014 Whoa!! Guess I know where all those posts went. Apologies for the triple taps! Good stuff, BTW.
marcus4hire Posted April 29, 2014 Author Posted April 29, 2014 P-51D landing pattern at IwoJima in 1945. That would be cool to try with three others.
Recommended Posts