Red Hammer Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 I want to say somthing. In v1.02, ED delete R-27EA, their execuse is R-27EA never producted. Now I say R-73M2, their execuse is it is a old phototype, Unreal. In fact I have evident to prove that R-27EA and R-73M2 are both real and have been operated in Chinese People's Liberation Army for years. I have a friend who is a Su-27 pilot in PLA, he told me that He fired both R-27EA and R-73M2 in advanced training mission. And I also have another evident: http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/weapon/r27.asp http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/weapon/r73.asp If ED don't want to add it because it is still classfield in Russia, Please tell us straight. So at least Chinese players' hearts will feel better.:( [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Red Hammer Posted September 15, 2006 Author Posted September 15, 2006 What is the meaning of this? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Guest Cali Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 They said they aren't going to add it since it was never produced. You can't trust anything on the internet. Fake web pages pop up everyday, but you did say your friend told you he fired both of them. I can give ED proof that the 120 sucks and the AIM-9 range is not 8km like the game says, look here scroll to the bottom of the page http://www.f-16.net/f-16_armament_article1.html
Red Hammer Posted September 15, 2006 Author Posted September 15, 2006 I don't know about western missile such as Aim-9, because I don't know any one there. By the way, here is the prove of Su-27Sk carry R-77 in China. http://www.softwar.net/plaaf.html http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/fighter/j11.asp [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Red Hammer Posted September 15, 2006 Author Posted September 15, 2006 And by the way, who care about Aim-9 or F-16, it is not even flyable in the Lock on [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Guest Cali Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 And by the way, who care about Aim-9 or F-16, it is not even flyable in the Lock on We do have the AIM-9, the range in lock on is 8km while the 73 is twice that. Listen here you little :censored: What verison 27 do we fly in LO? We aren't getting the R-77 on the 27, we aren't getting the 27EA or R-73M2, who cares what China flies, who cares about the 27EA or the R-73M2. I'm getting tried of your post always demanding ED add this or you have the manual so do this ED. Who are you? Has ED answered you? If not, then there is your answer, they don't like you, I don't like you :chair: Here are some of YOUR post http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=18330 http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=18367 http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=18079 http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=16827 And there was about 4 other post that I could have linked here but I think that was enough.
Pilotasso Posted September 15, 2006 Posted September 15, 2006 In democracy you cant help people from expressing his ideas but having said that you also have the right to ignore them whenever you want. .
chrno120 Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 I agree with your sentiments but.. unfortunately, there isn't any China coalition in-game to begin with If you want to use the R-27EA, revert or make a seperate install of LOMAC 1.01 or 1.02 then use LOPE to add it to the Flankers inventory.. The most stupid member in the forum
chennuts Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Hell, let him LOPE the EA onto his planes all he wants and play online. Doesn't anyone remember what happened to the EA? :D
Alfa Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Please keep your discussions civilised whatever your disagreements. Cheers, - JJ. JJ
504 Wolverine Posted September 17, 2006 Posted September 17, 2006 Hell, let him LOPE the EA onto his planes all he wants and play online. Doesn't anyone remember what happened to the EA? :D Yep, it and the R-37 are limited to 1g manouvers to combat online cheating, so dont be expecting to hit anything with these missiles if you hack them on. :megalol: [/url]
Red Hammer Posted September 18, 2006 Author Posted September 18, 2006 We do have the AIM-9, the range in lock on is 8km while the 73 is twice that. Listen here you little :censored: What verison 27 do we fly in LO? We aren't getting the R-77 on the 27, we aren't getting the 27EA or R-73M2, who cares what China flies, who cares about the 27EA or the R-73M2. I'm getting tried of your post always demanding ED add this or you have the manual so do this ED. Who are you? Has ED answered you? If not, then there is your answer, they don't like you, I don't like you :chair: Here are some of YOUR post http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=18330 http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=18367 http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=18079 http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=16827 And there was about 4 other post that I could have linked here but I think that was enough. I was just asking if ED is possible to add it on, it was a request. I had never been rude to ED. I never said :ED add this and add that on or some order like that. I'm nothing but an Loyal Flanker Lover like most player. Beside, who are you I want to ask, who gave your authority to charge me like this. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Guest Cali Posted September 18, 2006 Posted September 18, 2006 And by the way, who care about Aim-9 or F-16, it is not even flyable in the Lock on. This statement you made gives me the authority.:director: I was just asking if ED is possible to add it on, it was a request. I had never been rude to ED. I never said :ED add this and add that on or some order like that. I'm nothing but an Loyal Flanker Lover like most player. Beside, who are you I want to ask, who gave your authority to charge me like this. The AIM-9 IS in the game and it think it is more important to fix that then add a missile was never used or a missile that is OUT of LO timeframe. Did you look at the links I posted of your other post?:v:
Red Hammer Posted September 19, 2006 Author Posted September 19, 2006 Only the F-16 can be unflyable, AIM-9 is not a plane, how can it be unflyable? You have authorty? What are you? Who do you think you are? My mother? Chinese Centrel Government? Chinese Communist Party? If you are none of those, you'd better ajust your bahavour. And don't give me execuse, Nobody here is gone miss you any way. 1 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
GGTharos Posted September 19, 2006 Posted September 19, 2006 Only the F-16 can be unflyable, AIM-9 is not a plane, how can it be unflyable? You have authorty? What are you? Who do you think you are? My mother? Chinese Centrel Government? Chinese Communist Party? If you are none of those, you'd better ajust your bahavour before there is a red point between your eyes. Nobody here is gone miss you any way. Uh, Red Hammer ... grow up. No one needs authority to tell you what you just said was the most childish thing ever. I suggest you apologize before a moderator sees this because believe, if you get banned, certainly no one will miss /you/ [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
SVK_Fox Posted September 19, 2006 Posted September 19, 2006 UFff, hold on guys. I think that If somebody love flanker it is not a problem, If somebody wants R-73M2 in the game or pink HUD it is only his need. So let people think, let people say what they want to say. ED could or couldnt say us what they will do and what they dont. And nobody will change this. But please do not attack another guys from this forum, because it will not help you. I think everybody have piece of truth and own dreams, so try to be polite and discuss about things. Discussion will help almost. Have a nice day guys:thumbup:
Red Hammer Posted September 19, 2006 Author Posted September 19, 2006 OK, If that is the cause I only apologize for the words Ive said, because ED tester team think it is right thing to do. Nothing else. Buy thy way, you are the v1.2 test team, can you tell me when is the v1.2 come out, I can not wait any longer. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Guest Cali Posted September 19, 2006 Posted September 19, 2006 Only the F-16 can be unflyable, AIM-9 is not a plane, how can it be unflyable? You have authorty? What are you? Who do you think you are? My mother? Chinese Centrel Government? Chinese Communist Party? If you are none of those, you'd better ajust your bahavour. And don't give me execuse, Nobody here is gone miss you any way. :beer:
GGTharos Posted September 19, 2006 Posted September 19, 2006 OK, If that is the cause I only apologize for the words Ive said, because ED tester team think it is right thing to do. Nothing else. Buy thy way, you are the v1.2 test team, can you tell me when is the v1.2 come out, I can not wait any longer. Thank you, and unfortunately I cannot tell you because I do not know. It is progressing nicely however, and I am certain that you will enjoy it once it comes out. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Red Hammer Posted September 22, 2006 Author Posted September 22, 2006 Wait a second, you are the v1.2 test team, that means you are a helicopter pilot, right? What would you do if you are facing fighter or SAMS or AAA. Helicopter can not run as fast as plane do. So how can helicopter live through this. Warsaw side have a Ka-50 helicopter, but NATO don't have it, it does't sounds very fair. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Guest Cali Posted September 22, 2006 Posted September 22, 2006 Wait a second, you are the v1.2 test team, that means you are a helicopter pilot, right? What would you do if you are facing fighter or SAMS or AAA. Helicopter can not run as fast as plane do. So how can helicopter live through this. Warsaw side have a Ka-50 helicopter, but NATO don't have it, it does't sounds very fair. The helicopter pilot might not have a good day. He better have good air cover, it will be just like the A-10 and 25/25T's now (they need air cover)
Recommended Posts