Jay Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 Hi folks, sorry if this was discussed earlier (didn't find similar thread though) but it seems to me that the Su25/T braking chutes' effectiveness in 1.1 is exagerrated. I mean you hit the P key and your plane almost instantly stops like it was trapped by some cable. This wasn't present in earlier version. There was quite normal chute's effectiveness for all Russian planes and it seemed pretty good. Well, I'm not expert for this but don't think that even two chutes can stop a plane going over 250 km/h so quickly... what do you think? ED - are you gonna tweak this somewhat in the BS or is it just good as it is for now? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice, OC to 2,66 GHz), MSI K8N Neo Platinum (nForce 3 250 Gb), 1,5 GB Corsair PC-3200 RAM, GeForce 7800GS 256 MB VGA (G71, OC to 535/1550 MHz, ForceWare 84.21), 2 x 300 GB Maxtor DiamondMax 10 SATA HDD (RAID 0), SB Audigy 2 ZS, 480W Thermaltake PurePower TWV PSU, Win XP SP2, MS SideWinder Precision 2, Belkin Nostromo n52 SpeedPad, HP L1902
Kula66 Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 Well, I remember complaining ages ago in earlier versions that they weren't effective enough! Remember full parachutes will slow the descent of loads weighing many tons ... so slowing an a/c, I would think would be faily dramatic - no evidence, just IMHO!
AKULA_OPTIMUS Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 The effec it´s very strong in the Su-25´s. But on the other planes it´s almost useless. I don´t know how it´s the real thing, but it should be more like the frogfoot:unsure:
EscCtrl Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 Dont compare to a parachute falling down as thats being dragged downward by gravity the whole time - whereas a plane landing is slowing and braking anyway plus there are the frictional forces of the tires anyway and the chutes for aircraft are designed differently. my thoughts anyway, i think it is realistic.
nscode Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 Dont compare to a parachute falling down why not? wheeeeeeee :) Never forget that World War III was not Cold for most of us.
EscCtrl Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 why not? wheeeeeeee :) the speed is still 207 and probably gonna accelerate through parachutes maximum force capabiltity (the force it can hold before being torn off - or speed in lomacs case i.e. 250) but yeah i see your point :P
Force_Feedback Posted September 27, 2006 Posted September 27, 2006 in lomac's case the speed is 299 kph 20C summer, if you deploy the chute below 15km, the thing will only slow down, no broken chutes at all. Creedence Clearwater Revival:worthy:
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted September 28, 2006 ED Team Posted September 28, 2006 Hi folks, sorry if this was discussed earlier (didn't find similar thread though) but it seems to me that the Su25/T braking chutes' effectiveness in 1.1 is exagerrated. I mean you hit the P key and your plane almost instantly stops like it was trapped by some cable. This wasn't present in earlier version. There was quite normal chute's effectiveness for all Russian planes and it seemed pretty good. Well, I'm not expert for this but don't think that even two chutes can stop a plane going over 250 km/h so quickly... what do you think? ED - are you gonna tweak this somewhat in the BS or is it just good as it is for now? No. No tweak at all because the Su-25's chute effectiveness (i.e. CD)is precisely tuned. The braking distance either for wheel brakes or chute with wheel brakes fit the reality. We know the chute total area and the CD for the chute is well known so everyone can esimate its effectivness. Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
Recommended Posts