Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've seen the Mirage be able to distinguish between the 3 versions of the MiG 29, and yet no other aircraft in DCS currently does. Is this correct behaviour?

/да бойз/

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
I've seen the Mirage be able to distinguish between the 3 versions of the MiG 29, and yet no other aircraft in DCS currently does. Is this correct behaviour?

 

If the three mig29 variants have different radars, I guess it makes sense.

 

French ministry of defence probably wont tell us if the have the ELINT and if that ELINT has been used for the RWR. :)

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

*unexpected flight behaviour* Oh shiii*** ! What ? Why ? What is happening ?

Posted
If the three mig29 variants have different radars, I guess it makes sense.

 

French ministry of defence probably wont tell us if the have the ELINT and if that ELINT has been used for the RWR. :)

 

As far as I'm aware the 3 versions all use the same radar

/да бойз/

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
MiG 29G...which is a MiG 29A

 

But a German MiG-29A :D

''Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction.''

Erich Fromm

Posted (edited)

well Mig-29S has an upgraded version of N019 (Rubin) ... the N019M ("Topaz")

so they're different radars with different types of antennas: Cassegrain vs. slotted planar array

 

N019M = Fox-3 capability to hit two targets simultaneously

Edited by ZHeN

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
well Mig-29S has an upgraded version of N019 (Rubin) ... the N019M ("Topaz")

so they're different radars with different types of antennas: Cassegrain vs. slotted planar array

 

N019M = Fox-3 capability to hit two targets simultaneously

 

N019M is not a slotted planar array antenna. Same as the N019, just new software and processor. The RWRs of the mirages timeframe shouldn't be able to distinguish a N019 and N001. The waveform is pretty much the same.

 

The mirages capability to distinguish between aircraft versions is not restricted to the MiG-29. It can also be observed with the F-16 and the Su-27/33. It seems like RAZBAM just copied the airplane names into the RWR library. I would really like to see an update on this, so that a MiG-29/Su-27/33 are all displayed as "29" or "27".

Posted
N019M is not a slotted planar array antenna. Same as the N019, just new software and processor.

I have different information

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

At least MiG 29A and MiG 29G are both "9.12" variant, with the same radar.

 

MiG 29S is "9.13" variant. I don't know if radar signal would be different enough to be recognized as such by 90' RWR...

Mirage fanatic !

I7-7700K/ MSI RTX3080/ RAM 64 Go/ SSD / TM Hornet stick-Virpil WarBRD + Virpil CM3 Throttle + MFG Crosswind + Reverb G2.

Flickr gallery: https://www.flickr.com/gp/71068385@N02/728Hbi

Posted

Even though radar characteristics (PRI, freq...) would be different enough between the two for the RWR to accurately detect it, I don't believe this would be a relevant thing to display it (information overload), not to mention that the display usually shows 1-2 digits spots.

Posted

I think you guys are overestimating the capabilities of RWRs. The A-10s AN/ALR-69 was not capable to distinguish between SA-8 and ZSU-23-4, even though there are surely some differences between the two (simply because one is meant to guide a missile and the other is for directing AAA).

Posted
I think you guys are overestimating the capabilities of RWRs. The A-10s AN/ALR-69 was not capable to distinguish between SA-8 and ZSU-23-4, even though there are surely some differences between the two (simply because one is meant to guide a missile and the other is for directing AAA).

 

I agree with this.

 

If the F-15C can't differentiate then I wouldn't expect the M2KC to be able to either.

 

(Not based upon any knowledge I have in the subject, it's just that the F-15C is a contemporary of the Mirage and if the Yanks could have the capability they'd probably have implemented it)

/да бойз/

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted

Guys, I think the current RWR is simply asking to DCS database.

 

Probably it should be "upgraded" (code-wise) or "downgraded" (differentiation-wise) as to better simulate what we know of RWRs and radars from the time.

 

Note: OTOH, the RWR should be able to differentiate RDI (2000C) and RDY (2000-5) radars. So it goes both ways.

 

++

Az'

spacer.png

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...