microvax Posted June 7, 2017 Posted June 7, 2017 To my knowledge the RB74 is a aim9-l variant, which it is also represented as in game 3d model wise. But the RB74 still performs like the RB24j in terms of seeker performance, aka rear aspect only. To my knowledge this is very much wrong, as the only difference between aim9-m and aim9-l is only the CCM capabilities, so the RB74 should have the same all aspect capabilities as the aim9-m. What is the state on this issue ? :) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] *unexpected flight behaviour* Oh shiii*** ! What ? Why ? What is happening ?
Delta59R Posted April 20, 2019 Posted April 20, 2019 To my knowledge the RB74 is a aim9-l variant, which it is also represented as in game 3d model wise. But the RB74 still performs like the RB24j in terms of seeker performance, aka rear aspect only. To my knowledge this is very much wrong, as the only difference between aim9-m and aim9-l is only the CCM capabilities, so the RB74 should have the same all aspect capabilities as the aim9-m. What is the state on this issue ? :) Bump! I am curious about this too. Thanks Meshify C w Noctua Fans, MSI Carbon Z790, 13900KS, 64gb 7200 Gskill, MSI 4090, MSI 240, Sam 1tb m2, Sam 2tb m2, Seasonic 1000w, MSFF2 Stick + X56 Throttle, HP Reverb G2, Sony 83in A90J OLED
Airhunter Posted April 21, 2019 Posted April 21, 2019 Not really, I have killed Mirages and F/A-18's in multiplayer going head on from below. Front aspect.
razo+r Posted April 21, 2019 Posted April 21, 2019 How much from below or at what angle? Because this makes obviously also a difference.
Recommended Posts