More stages in nozzle scheduling

[bkthunder]

Since the last update, the nozzles jump from full open to less than 100% position when quickly advancing the throttle to full AB from IDLE and back.

watched in slow-mo as well, and it just jumps from one position to another without intermediate animations. The same cna be confirmed from the cockpit gauges.

 

As as side-note, what about that RL F-18 pilot's comment that nozzles close by slightly advancing the throttles without increasing RPM or FF (and this is enough to start taxiing)?

[bkthunder]

How is this a topic for the wishlist??????????????

It's a bug not a wish, and it wasn't there before the last update.

[Mars Exulte]

Probably the wording of your title, I initially misunderstood as well until I read more closely.

[fullcoupe]

As as side-note, what about that RL F-18 pilot's comment that nozzles close by slightly advancing the throttles without increasing RPM or FF (and this is enough to start taxiing)?

 

Can't speak to the nozzle behavior, but I've always felt it takes a lot of throttle to get the Hornet rolling, even with a clean loadout. The AV-8B, Mirage, A-10 all require very little input to move forward.

 

IRL pilots have also made comments that the first half of the throttle range not being effective enough, whether it's in the air or on the ground.

[bkthunder]

Probably the wording of your title, I initially misunderstood as well until I read more closely.

 

Lol because *somebody* changed the title after moving it from the bug section :music_whistling::music_whistling::music_whistling::music_whistling::music_whistling:

[Vitormouraa]

Can't speak to the nozzle behavior, but I've always felt it takes a lot of throttle to get the Hornet rolling, even with a clean loadout. The AV-8B, Mirage, A-10 all require very little input to move forward.

 

IRL pilots have also made comments that the first half of the throttle range not being effective enough, whether it's in the air or on the ground.

 

This has nothing to do with the thread...