Jump to content

Aircraft performance after update to 2.5.5.40603 Open Beta


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi folks,

 

 

During a recent test flight having a toy on my wing (was an F-18 8) ) he only saw my ass when I accelerated ...

After a while I was flying at 20.000 feet, at nearly M1.3 ... WITH MIL POWER!

Was this possible with the real cat? Weather was at ISA minus 15.

 

I was a bit surprised and thought ... WOW!

 

Here is a pic which shows M1.4@ISA-17

Screen_191207_225552.thumb.png.03b277c25d664b0fe165cabd453a5d73.png

Edited by TOViper

Visit https://www.viggen.training
...Viggen... what more can you ask for?

my computer:
AMD Ryzen 5600G 4.4 GHz | NVIDIA RTX 3080 10GB | 32 GB 3.2 GHz DDR4 DUAL | SSD 980 256 GB SYS + SSD 2TB DCS | TM Warthog Stick + Throttle + TRP | Rift CV1

 

Posted

I believe some things need to be changed /updated now that the weight bug has been found and squashed.

 

Don't quote me on this though.

Strike

USLANTCOM.com

stepped_with_391_new_small.png

i7-9700K OC 5GHz| MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PRO CARBON | 32GB DDR4 3200 | GTX 3090 | Samsung SSD | HP Reverb G2 | VIRPIL Alpha | VIRPIL Blackhawk | HOTAS Warthog

 

Posted (edited)

Yeah, more tweaking is necessary. I tune the high end of the thrust range based on the only performance data we have (which sadly does not include a clean configuration, and is only for two power settings, MIL and max AB), so a change in stores drag requires re-checking both the MIL and MAX AB thrust/top speed ranges since the stores drag is baked into the total aircraft drag in this situation. It's fairly time consuming, hoping to get it done before the holiday break. I've already started adjusting the AB against the 4xAIM7 and 4xAIM9 loadout (the cleanest configuration we have).

Edited by fat creason

Systems Engineer & FM Modeler

Heatblur Simulations

Posted

I do remember reading somewhere that with something like half-fuel it had a better than 1:1 dry thrust ratio and actually capable of super cruising with the F-110-GE-400s. (Not the Super 21)

Posted
Yeah, more tweaking is necessary. I tune the high end of the thrust range based on the only performance data we have (which sadly does not include a clean configuration, and is only for two power settings, MIL and max AB), so a change in stores drag requires re-checking both the MIL and MAX AB thrust/top speed ranges since the stores drag is baked into the total aircraft drag in this situation. It's fairly time consuming, hoping to get it done before the holiday break. I've already started adjusting the AB against the 4xAIM7 and 4xAIM9 loadout (the cleanest configuration we have).

 

 

According to the obvious lack of data this all appears as a difficult task, and I hope you can manage to disassemble all drag data from engine performance with some good and "healthy" assumptions. I wish I could help you out with some calculations, but unfortunately I am not working at HB :huh: thus I have no idea of the drag- and engine thrust model currently used. But I am sure you find your way through the jungle. Good luck! :joystick:

Visit https://www.viggen.training
...Viggen... what more can you ask for?

my computer:
AMD Ryzen 5600G 4.4 GHz | NVIDIA RTX 3080 10GB | 32 GB 3.2 GHz DDR4 DUAL | SSD 980 256 GB SYS + SSD 2TB DCS | TM Warthog Stick + Throttle + TRP | Rift CV1

 

Posted
I do remember reading somewhere that with something like half-fuel it had a better than 1:1 dry thrust ratio and actually capable of super cruising with the F-110-GE-400s. (Not the Super 21)

 

It can supercruise in a clean config around 25k, and should otherwise be very near sonic speeds from sea level all the way to 35k at MIL.

Systems Engineer & FM Modeler

Heatblur Simulations

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...