Dannyvandelft

That's what I was looking for, ty! Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

REALLY!? 2 weeks, couldn't make it happen? Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

With the F-4 launching, and a lot of emphasis being put on the Vietnam War and the Cold War era, I'd like to see troops from that era. U.S. Soldiers in their respective uniforms carrying M-16 or M-60 weapons. North Vietnamese troops carrying AK-47's. Russian troops in era correct uniforms, Middle-East, you name it. It's a bit hard to make proper missions when your choices are WW2 or Modern troops, and an "Insurgent". Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Chatting on Discord just now, and felt like bringing it up here to the devs. ED is developing 3 modules right now, that we know of, plus many more in EA. Meanwhile QOL things are falling behind. Things like, drogue basket behavior, AI models that look old, AI behavior to incoming missiles, and AI behavior overall. ATC, and so on, and so forth. It seems like, I could be wrong, that ED is focusing much harder on building modules to sell, than maintaining/improving the world those modules live in. I can only speak for myself, but I'd gladly pay a subscription fee, let's say $15 a month, for ED not having to build modules, or less modules, and can direct all, or most of their devs to said above QOL improvements. The model I'd use would be similar to World of Warcraft. $15 monthly for the base game, for ED to maintain and improve the world we fly in. Focusing most if not all devs to upgrade AI, ATC, AI models, things like drogue physics, weather, updating old modules, and so on. 3rd parties bring their modules as normal, for their normal prices, and will be viewed as expansions, i.e. The Tomcat is The Burning Crusade, The Phantom is Wrath of the Lich King, etc. Having all these modules coming out is great, and I'm looking forward to a lot of them, but the world we use them in has to be kept up as well, past adding terrains. Anyway, my 2 cents. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Landing gear physics on the P-51 are too sensitive I think. For a sturdy plane capable of landing in a grassy field, it seems too easy to damage the gear. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Seems to be too sensitive for a plane that can take off and land from a grassy field. I'd think it be more sturdy than that. My wingman had a broken tail wheel, and I had a stuck main gear strut. And we did nothing crazy. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I did a slow repair, that fixed it. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I get an initialization 2 error after the latest update, worked fine 5 minutes ago before the update. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

That's good to hear. I like the VOIP a lot. Especially how it makes the Warbird radios sounds authentic. But it's annoying I can't hear half the server because they're on SRS. It sounds mean, and I don't want it to be, but since VOIP is getting up there in functionality, maybe force people on VOIP? Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Was afraid of that. In that case ED should either absorb SRS, or make it impossible to use. Having half the server on one, and the rest on the other, is silly. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

No I'm asking that a user using VOIP on 253.000 can talk to an SRS user on 253.000 Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Is it possible to make it so SRS and VOIP users to communicate on the same frequency? If not, why not make it so it does? Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I didn't say nothing, I said "certain features" I asked about. Wing vapor, yes that's coming. Circuit breakers aren't, because the Tomcat isn't modeled like that. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I asked the devs if certain features of the Phantom would come to the Tomcat, and long story short, the Tomcat model doesn't allow for it. It's a completely different process. And since the new Tomcat model would be a seperate module for full price, I expect HB themselves would want nothing less than a plane simulation equally as impressive as the Phantom. The Phantom is the new standard in DCS, and I expect they themselves would want nothing less than that for the next gen Tomcat. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I'm sure either a B(u) or D would be built completely from the ground up, akin to the Phantom's modeling. I doubt they would reuse the current model. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

It takes the same amount of time regardless if they start the pre-sale 3 months before, or 3 days before release lol. It'll come when it's ready. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I love watching guys like "Slammer" Richardson and "Nasty" Menazzer interviews. Guys who really know how to fly an aircraft like the Tomcat. Down to earth guys who I'd love to buy a beer. I wouldn't buy Mover a free cup of water. When you watch a show like the Tomcast you get a whole different vibe. Guys who loved their aircraft and the people that made her fly. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Looking for a laid back but serious group to fly with that's standing up an F-4E Squadron. 5 years Tomcat experience, with other modules like Warbirds mixed in. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Looking for a laid back but serious group to fly with that's standing up an F-4E Squadron. 5 years Tomcat experience, with other modules like Warbirds mixed in. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

No way. There will be at least a two week period for Steam users to pre-order. It'll be March. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Tomcat 1, Hornet 1, Hornet 2, flying in formation. Tomcat 1 could transmit and receive Hornet 1. Hornet 1 could transmit and receive Hornet 2. Tomcat 1 could NOT transmit and receive Hornet 2. Hornet 1 could transmit and receive everyone, Tomcat 1 and Hornet 2 couldn't. Weird thing was, Tomcat 1 and Hornet 2 could see each other keying up, and hear the mic click, but no voice was heard. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

I'm sure it's been asked before, but it bears repeating. ED could you make it so uncontrolled client aircraft show up on the tarmac and deck? So when you spawn into a fresh server, or a low populated one, airfields and carriers look alive with planes parked everywhere. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Against adversaries of it's time, yes. Against more modern jets, not so much. If you're planning on flying the Phantom in a present setting, I'd stick to a SEAD/DEAD or strike role. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Please make all the upcoming Phantom campaigns FWAF (Fly With A Friend) capable. A lot of warbird missions are, and it would just add so much to fly a campaign with a human RIO/WSO. Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

Multi-player missions on Normandy? Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk