VWJ Posted January 28, 2020 Posted January 28, 2020 It is simple, If you do not own either F/A-18 and or F-14 then this module is of no actual use to you other than look pretty. It was developed with F/A-18 in mind primarily so expect full support for it and F-14 is compatible with the help from Heatblur. Jump jets and helos can probably land on it like any other free carrier but no real simulation provided for them. Why should HB need to do anything? Tomcat can land on current carrier and SC is no different. Deck crew does not care what ac type it launches, pattern is also the same. If someone need to actually change something, ED should add pilot salute on launch same as Tomcat has. Danger zone!
SkateZilla Posted January 28, 2020 Posted January 28, 2020 Well, the Tomcat is a completely different generation of aircraft so it would probably require a whole different method and interaction with the carrier. I am sure that people can just hook to them or launch like any other "basic" carrier but fully simulated and interactive landing or launching is a very different story. From ED's response it seems like Heatblur needs to do more work to get it fully compatible with this module. Heatblur were probably busy developing simulation with their carrier so this just adds more work on their plate. Especially if they were coding or developing separate method of interaction between F-14 and the Forrestal carrier. Let us hope it all works out in the end but I am still holding off on my purchase of the supercarrier until it is very clear what we are getting. F-14 and F/A-18 are of the Same Generation, Just Different Programs (Tactical Fighter Interceptor, Light Weight Fighter Attacker) Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2), ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9) 3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs
kontiuka Posted January 28, 2020 Posted January 28, 2020 If we expect them to interact with the aircraft in believable ways they certainly do. They can't *see* where the plane and its components are, they have to *know*.agreed. Sounds like something ED would have to code for each airframe unless there is some deck crew API that 3rd parties could use.
r4y30n Posted January 28, 2020 Posted January 28, 2020 Let's not forget, there are differences in recovery as well as launch.
Adrian858 Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 One of the biggest questions I have regarding the F-14 using the Super Carrier DLC is the RIO position... What if the pilot has the DLC, but the RIO does not? I'm sure this is something that'll be considered, hopefully sooner rather than later. :thumbup: Corsair Vengeance C-70 (OD), EVGA Z370 FTW, i7-8700k, Noctua NH-D15, RTX 4070ti TUF OC, Corsair Vengeance LPX 64GB DDR4 3200MHz, Samsung SSD 970 Pro NVMe M.2 1TB & 990 Pro NVMe M.2 2TB , WD Black 4TB Perf HDD - 7200 RPM SuperNOVA 750W P2 Modular, ASUS ROG Swift 27" 2560x1440 TM Warthog, TM F/A-18C Grip, TM Pendular Rudder Pedals, VPC CM3 Base, VPC Rotor TCS Base, VPC Apache-64, VPC Control Panel 1, WinWing PTO 2, Cougar MFD's, TekCreations F/A-18C Master Arm, Koolertron Keypad, Meta Quest 3 A-10C/II - AH-64D - AV-8B - CH-47F - F-4E - F-5E - F-14 - F-15E - F-16C - F/A-18C - OH-58D - P-51D - Bf-109K4 - FC3 - UH-1H - Combined Arms - Super Carrier Afghanistan - Nevada - Normandy - Persian Gulf - Sinai - Syria
Kid18120 Posted February 5, 2020 Posted February 5, 2020 One of the biggest questions I have regarding the F-14 using the Super Carrier DLC is the RIO position... What if the pilot has the DLC, but the RIO does not? I'm sure this is something that'll be considered, hopefully sooner rather than later. :thumbup: The RIO is just following the Pilot's position so if the pilot has the collision model enabled, the RIO would "stick" to it. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Simming since 2005 My Rig: Gigabyte X470 Aorus Ultra Gaming, AMD Ryzen7 2700X, G.Skill RipJaws 32GB DDR4-3200, EVGA RTX 2070 Super Black Gaming, Corsair HX850
Recommended Posts