RocketmanAL Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 (edited) Three years ago I did a study on the flares with the A-10C, primarily to determine an optimal flare profile and to see how different factors impacted the decoy rate. You can find the results of that study here: A-10C Flare Effectiveness Study Recently I decided to do another study in the Harrier, as I'm been flying it quite often and find the inconsistency of the flares annoying. The results are available here: Harrier Flare Effectiveness Study TL;DR: Program G QTY: 2 INT: 1 provides the best protection with the minimum required flares. Next, I will be testing the Hornet's flares in a new study. After that, I might re-do the A-10C study since it was before V2.5 released. I do not own the J-17 or F-16, so I won't be able to do those tests until I purchase them. Willing to consider other aircraft that have an automatic countermeasure programming system. [16AGR]Rocketman Edited February 7, 2020 by RocketmanAL Typo
JaBoG32_Herby Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 Outstanding. Many thanks for your effort. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Mr_sukebe Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 Always love this kind of stuff. Great work, my thanks for publishing. 7800x3d, 5080, 64GB, PCIE5 SSD - Oculus Pro - Moza (AB9), Virpil (Alpha, CM3, CM1 and CM2), WW (TOP and CP), TM (MFDs, Pendular Rudder), Tek Creations (F18 panel), Total Controls (Apache MFD), Jetseat
tom_19d Posted February 7, 2020 Posted February 7, 2020 Nicely done, thanks for the effort. Interesting read. Multiplayer as Variable Asus Z97-A - I7 4790K - 32 GB HyperX - EVGA GTX 1080 Ti - Corsair 750i PSU TM Warthog HOTAS - TM Cougar MFDs - CH Pedals - TrackIR 5 - Samsung RU8000 55”
Recommended Posts