Jump to content

Comparative test of the speed brakes M-2000xJF-17


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

There were taken M-2000 fuel 39% and JF-17 fuel 100%

Their weight is equal.

Overall dimensions are similar.

 

Take a look:

 

Of course the other aircrafts in DCS is going to go forward much faster! )))

Edited by Shmal

Мой позывной в DCS: _SkyRider_

Мой канал YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGdfzT7-xbgvmPwmUcCNArQ?view_as=subscriber

 

My callsign on DCS is: _SkyRider_

My YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGdfzT7-xbgvmPwmUcCNArQ?view_as=subscriber

Posted

Would you enlighten us (or me at least, because I really don't get it) on what that is supposed to tell us?

Posted

All airbrakes are not equal, just like not all brakes are equal or landing gears etc etc.

 

But if you have same speed (check)

Same weight (inertia)

 

Then it is up to air brakes design that how much they can start causing drag and how they might disturb your aircraft airflow.

 

But only conclusion I can find from such test is that M2000 has superior air brakes so it can quickly slow down, while JF-17 has much less effective ones.

i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S.

i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.

Posted

Now try it with the Viggen :P its airbrakes were so useless they eventually were wired shut since they didn't do much at all.

Posted

Surf's up!

 

01-0154-01-0030-74-TA-7C-156801-Vought.jpg

- Jack of many DCS modules, master of none.

- Personal wishlist: F-15A, F-4S Phantom II, JAS 39A Gripen, SAAB 35 Draken, F-104 Starfighter, Panavia Tornado IDS.

 

| Windows 11 | i5-12400 | 64Gb DDR4 | RTX 3080 | 2x M.2 | 27" 1440p | Rift CV1 | Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS | MFG Crosswind pedals |

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...