insufficent real world evidence Is double GBU-32 possible on rack?

[SkateZilla]

14 hours ago, Ipergallo said:

We speak about 1000 lb class weapons... GBU-31 is a 2000 lb class weapon...

so...

so...

so two yeas passed and any response, there are docs, there are photos, there are... always the same Torquemada that block any F-18C implementation in weapons stores... Why? I think that... (sorry I can't find a photo for that so I can't say...)

ED have find a brilliant solution for any Torquemada, but... for some reasons, that I don't know, only for F-16C harm gate resolution...

Why we can't have a double rack BRU-55 for GBU-32? No response in 2 years...

Why we can't have a single rack for aim-120 ? No response... If you think that is no good for a Navy F-18C, purists can always use payload restrictions in ME...

Why we can't have a single rack for rockets? No response... If you think that is no good for a Navy F-18C, purists can always use payload restrictions...

 

2 years of no response... Thank you!

 

1. I'd have to ask my friends the flew legacy hornets, but for the USN, it was likely weight/clearance issues w/ the SUU63

2. Because the BRU-32 interface in the SUU-63 Pylon do not support AIM-120 Directly nor the LAU-127 Adapter required, Therefore the SUU-63A w/ BRU-32 mounts, Attach the LAU-115C/A w/ the Dual LAU-127/A Rails and the proper interface adapter.

3. Because the BRU-32 interface in the SUU-63 Pylon does not support LAU-Pods being directly attached to it, hence the BRU/42 or BRU/55

For USN/USMC F/A-18A/B/C/D/C+, Single AIM9/120 Configuration is LAU115C+2x127 (Dual) with a single store.
Switzerland Operators Bought and use a different pylon for Locations 2 and 8 on their legacy hornets.

[SickSidewinder9]

Ok, but dual carriage of GBU-32s.  Come on, just do it.

Is there so much documentation of dual carriage of JSOWs?  8 of them?!

[Ipergallo]

So... another reponse that song like an excuse, please let me know why ED have to simulate a specific configuration without ANY other implementation of any other nation that use the F-18C? Peoples that pay for purchase a module dont have any contract with US Navy, and by the way, configurations of F18-C for US Navy aren't the same in loadouts for the USMC, so actually we have an F-18C US Navy configuration with some payloads from USMC like litening II and others. Ok, Swiss F-18 have a specific pylon for aim-120C but are Swiss, ok Australians are stranges because of kankaroo... So next time in module purchase sheet, in the title, please put F-18C US Navy exclusively only and only so is immediatly clear.

Thank you.

[bennyboy9800]

Considering F-16s are using triple rack mavericks, this should be a given ED. The argument that sufficient evidence is lacking doesn’t stand up after the conversations in this discord, especially considering the dual rack JSOWs have been implemented. 

Dual GBU-32s should be implemented. 

[BIGNEWY]

Please PM me any public evidence for this 

thanks