not planned Missing HUD symbology in STT mode

[musolo]

I get it when they turn blind eye  for less vital things. But there is nothing that compares to this TTI line importance in BVR fight. Direct misrepresentation of combat potential of last generation of Soviet  fighter jets is what we have here.  And its fixable, its doable. i`ve been told by @Chizh  in Russian branch of the forum about missing tone from heat seeking missiles on Flankrums that -" it`s not  that crucial"  and "that they will implement it when they will do clickable versions". Ok. If you say so). But what about this TTI indication? There is nothing more crucial than this line that Flankrums have been deprived of. 

Would you be so kind man and finally  tell us what`s up this that feauture? Will it be implemented for FC3 soviet fighters or not? You `ve told me that docks will have the final say in such requests. And tone thing wasn`t that important. Well this time it is the MOST important thing out there. And you`ve been presented with docs as you demanded for such inquiries. 

So what`s its gonna be? 

 

Edited July 11, 2021 by musolo

[Snappy]

On 7/11/2021 at 10:39 AM, Cmptohocah said:

I don't think this is a solid argument. I mean, what is the line that should not be crossed when implementing features in this case (Su-27 time to impact)?

Don’t ask me, ask ED. I do not know what their internal requirements are for documents to be acceptable and legally usable.

 

23 hours ago, musolo said:

I get it when they turn blind eye  for less vital things. But there is nothing that compares to this TTI line importance in BVR fight. Direct misrepresentation of combat potential of last generation of Soviet  fighter jets is what we have here.  And its fixable, its doable. i`ve been told by @Chizh  in Russian branch of the forum about missing tone from heat seeking missiles on Flankrums that -" it`s not  that crucial"  and "that they will implement it when they will do clickable versions". Ok. If you say so). But what about this TTI indication? There is nothing more crucial than this line that Flankrums have been deprived of. 

Would you be so kind man and finally  tell us what`s up this that feauture? Will it be implemented for FC3 soviet fighters or not? You `ve told me that docks will have the final say in such requests. And tone thing wasn`t that important. Well this time it is the MOST important thing out there. And you`ve been presented with docs as you demanded for such inquiries. 

So what`s its gonna be? 

 

 

Which part of „feature complete“ did you not understand?

ED said they consider FC3 feature complete( by their definition <- read this again) . I get that you deem this feature to be critically important for BVR combat, but that doesn’t change EDs stance.

They do not want to add anything else that is not currently already implemented.

 

regards,

 

Snappy

Edited July 12, 2021 by Snappy

[Cmptohocah]

30 minutes ago, Snappy said:

Which part of „feature complete“ did you not understand?

ED said they consider FC3 feature complete( by their definition <- read this again) . I get that you deem this feature to be critically important for BVR combat, but that doesn’t change EDs stance.

They do not want to add anything else that is not currently already implemented.

 

Shame, really. I guess DCS is turning into NATO simulator, at least when it comes to air-to-air.

[BIGNEWY]

As has been mentioned before FC3 series is considered feature complete. 

 

We are addressing bugs still, but new features are not being added. 

 

With that said please remember to treat everyone with respect here on the forum. 

 

thanks