Skwirl865 Posted April 25, 2021 Posted April 25, 2021 Just ordered one and wondering what kind of results I’ll have coming from a gtx 1080. Also do u think a Ruben 2700x will hold it back or is that a decent match? I have a quest 2 and a rift s
Wdigman Posted April 25, 2021 Posted April 25, 2021 Where were you able to order this? Everything has been out of stock for months.
speed-of-heat Posted April 25, 2021 Posted April 25, 2021 It should be an improvement in GPU frametime, however you are likely to be bottlenecked by your CPU... something will always bottle neck something ... so if you can afford a better processor then definitely go for it ... not close enough to the AMD side of the house to know if you can do that without a MB/RAM replacement, as far as i can see a 3700x would bottleneck a 2070s so bear that in mind 1 SYSTEM SPECS: Hardware AMD 9800X3D, 64Gb RAM, 4090 FE, Virpil T50CM3 Throttle, WinWIng Orion 2 & F-16EX + MFG Crosswinds V2, Varjo Aero SOFTWARE: Microsoft Windows 11, VoiceAttack & VAICOM PRO YOUTUBE CHANNEL: @speed-of-heat
Macias671603 Posted April 25, 2021 Posted April 25, 2021 Currently sitting on I7 2.3 RTX 2080S with 32 GB ram. DCS on m.2. I get 35 to 45 FPS with graphics settings ballanced according many VR optimalizations videos. Even with this there is no way to come back to 2D with much higher graphic settings. 1 JuSt FlYing :pilotfly:
Fri13 Posted April 25, 2021 Posted April 25, 2021 I had 1080 Ti before upgrading, and I bought both 2080 S and 2080 Ti models to make a decision. The Ti didn't give advancement for it's extra ~550€ price so returned the Ti and kept Super. From the 1080 Ti model it was a good upgrade, worth then the 650€. It put Rift S to steady 40 FPS in cities and usual 80 was reachable in higher altitude or in ural areas. The 2080 Ti didn't offer that much better to get over 40 at them in most stressing scenes so it was not sensible to have. If I would have got steady 80 with Ti, then I would have kept it. But if example one gives 55-60 fps and another 65-70, then it is not sensible as both will fall to 40 limit. 1 i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S. i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.
Skwirl865 Posted April 25, 2021 Author Posted April 25, 2021 11 hours ago, Wdigman said: Where were you able to order this? Everything has been out of stock for months. Used on ebay. I just bit the bullet
Skwirl865 Posted April 25, 2021 Author Posted April 25, 2021 11 hours ago, speed-of-heat said: It should be an improvement in GPU frametime, however you are likely to be bottlenecked by your CPU... something will always bottle neck something ... so if you can afford a better processor then definitely go for it ... not close enough to the AMD side of the house to know if you can do that without a MB/RAM replacement, as far as i can see a 3700x would bottleneck a 2070s so bear that in mind I’m gonna try it and see. I figured it would bottleneck at 1080p or maybe 1440p but at be resolutions I figured I’d still be gpu bound. I’m gonna definitely find out. If I’m cpu bound I’ll probably try to get my hands on a 5600x. Luckily I can use the same mobo/ram so it’ll just be a cpu purchase 7 hours ago, Macias671603 said: Currently sitting on I7 2.3 RTX 2080S with 32 GB ram. DCS on m.2. I get 35 to 45 FPS with graphics settings ballanced according many VR optimalizations videos. Even with this there is no way to come back to 2D with much higher graphic settings. Which i7 is 2.3? I’m not very familiar with intel with their naming schemes. It gets complicated lol 7 hours ago, Fri13 said: I had 1080 Ti before upgrading, and I bought both 2080 S and 2080 Ti models to make a decision. The Ti didn't give advancement for it's extra ~550€ price so returned the Ti and kept Super. From the 1080 Ti model it was a good upgrade, worth then the 650€. It put Rift S to steady 40 FPS in cities and usual 80 was reachable in higher altitude or in ural areas. The 2080 Ti didn't offer that much better to get over 40 at them in most stressing scenes so it was not sensible to have. If I would have got steady 80 with Ti, then I would have kept it. But if example one gives 55-60 fps and another 65-70, then it is not sensible as both will fall to 40 limit. Which headset do u use?
Fri13 Posted April 25, 2021 Posted April 25, 2021 5 minutes ago, Skwirl865 said: Which headset do u use? Rift S. That is why I didn't need to get anything between 40 FPS and 80 FPS as you need just steady 40 FPS. For the Rift CV1 it would have been 45 FPS limitation. And for various other headsets you need to get higher and higher FPS steadily to get the smooth performance. So with Rift S if you can't reach steady 80, then you don't benefit anything X better than Y between 40-80 range. So if the 2080 Ti would have given steady 80 and 2080 Super steady 40, then it would be no brainer to get the 2080 Ti. 1 i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S. i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.
Skwirl865 Posted April 25, 2021 Author Posted April 25, 2021 2 hours ago, Fri13 said: Rift S. That is why I didn't need to get anything between 40 FPS and 80 FPS as you need just steady 40 FPS. For the Rift CV1 it would have been 45 FPS limitation. And for various other headsets you need to get higher and higher FPS steadily to get the smooth performance. So with Rift S if you can't reach steady 80, then you don't benefit anything X better than Y between 40-80 range. So if the 2080 Ti would have given steady 80 and 2080 Super steady 40, then it would be no brainer to get the 2080 Ti. We have one rift s and one quest 2. They actually belong to my kids and so do the PCs but only one is a big gamer so there’s usually a pc available for me to play on whenever I want to and the one who games has fell in love with dcs too Apts something we can do together.
Macias671603 Posted April 26, 2021 Posted April 26, 2021 (edited) 17 hours ago, Skwirl865 said: Which i7 is 2.3? I’m not very familiar with intel with their naming schemes. It gets complicated lol Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10875H CPU @ 2.30GHz Edited April 26, 2021 by Macias671603 JuSt FlYing :pilotfly:
Skwirl865 Posted April 27, 2021 Author Posted April 27, 2021 On 4/26/2021 at 7:48 AM, Macias671603 said: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10875H CPU @ 2.30GHz Are u more cpu or gpu bound in vr?
durka-durka Posted April 27, 2021 Posted April 27, 2021 Ryzen 7 3700x 3.6GHz 32 GB RAM 2080 Super HP Reverb 1 Pro I get around 44fps in the F-16 and a little less when my head is down. It took lots of work getting the settings just right, but my 2080 Super does just fine with this setup and I'm sure yours will do better with the Rift S. VR is worth every penny. 1 492nd Squadron CO (F-15E): JTF-111 - Discord Link
Skwirl865 Posted April 30, 2021 Author Posted April 30, 2021 On 4/27/2021 at 6:31 PM, durka-durka said: Ryzen 7 3700x 3.6GHz 32 GB RAM 2080 Super HP Reverb 1 Pro I get around 44fps in the F-16 and a little less when my head is down. It took lots of work getting the settings just right, but my 2080 Super does just fine with this setup and I'm sure yours will do better with the Rift S. VR is worth every penny. Care to share a screenshot of your dcs and nvidia settings? got the card today and am quite impressed with my silicon. I haven’t tinkered much with the overclock, I just put it and 120 on the core and then just threw the memory slider to the right and then more and more. It acted up when I turned it to the max(1500mhz) so I took it back 100mhz and it’s been solid so far. Haven’t fully tested it with an overnight benchmark or anything but it took a few hours of dcs like a champ so cha fee are good it’s fully stable. 1400mhz on memory is the most I’ve ever seen in person. My 1080 would do 500-600.
Recommended Posts