Jump to content

F-15 over Lithuania (Baltic Air Policing)


Kusch

Recommended Posts

PoAF took 4 F-16's and it took 75 men to service them.

[sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic]

My PC specs below:

Case: Corsair 400C

PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum

CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T)

RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T

MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4

GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X

Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red

HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals

Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes: ???

[sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic]

My PC specs below:

Case: Corsair 400C

PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum

CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T)

RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T

MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4

GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X

Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red

HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals

Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what we both mean is that we prefer Europeans to protect European air space, no?

 

NATO is a relic of the Cold War and represents US influence hanging around. Europe needs to be strong by itself and increase cooperation with its nearby neighbours instead of being seen as a threat. NATO is in the way of such closer cooperation and the US has everything to gain from this. Europe needs to be independent and not biased either west or east. Maybe this is too much politics. Sorry.


Edited by eurofor

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what we both mean is that we prefer Europeans to protect European air space, no?

 

NATO is a relic of the Cold War and represents US influence hanging around. Europe needs to be strong by itself and increase cooperation with its nearby neighbours instead of being seen as a threat. NATO is in the way of such closer cooperation and the US has everything to gain from this. Europe needs to be independent and not biased either west or east. Maybe this is too much politics. Sorry.

 

 

No comment:

 

30.03.2004 Belgian Air Force (F-16AM)

01.07.2004 Denmark AF (F-16AM)

30.10.2004 RAF (Tornado ADV)

01.01.2005 Norway AF (F-16AM)

30.03.2005 Holland AF (F-16AM)

30.06.2005 Luftwaffe (F-4F Phantom)

12.10.2005 USAF (F-16CJ)

01.06.2006 Polish AF (MiG-29)

31.03.2006 Turkish AF (F-16C)

01.08.2006 Spain AF (Mirage F1)

01.12.2006 Belgian AF (F-16AM)

01.04.2007 France AF (Mirage 2000C)

01.08.2007 Romania AF (MiG-21)

01.11.2007 Portugal AF (F-16AM)

15.03.2008 Polish AF (MiG-29)

30.06.2008 Luftwaffe (F-4F Phantom)

01.10.2008 USAF (F-15C)


Edited by Kusch

Give me "flying telephone pole" (SA-2)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What list is that? Doesnt seem to make much sense. ^^^^ :huh:

[sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic4448_29.gif[/sigpic]

My PC specs below:

Case: Corsair 400C

PSU: SEASONIC SS-760XP2 760W Platinum

CPU: AMD RYZEN 3900X (12C/24T)

RAM: 32 GB 4266Mhz (two 2x8 kits) of trident Z RGB @3600Mhz CL 14 CR=1T

MOBO: ASUS CROSSHAIR HERO VI AM4

GFX: GTX 1080Ti MSI Gaming X

Cooler: NXZT Kraken X62 280mm AIO

Storage: Samsung 960 EVO 1TB M.2+6GB WD 6Gb red

HOTAS: Thrustmaster Warthog + CH pro pedals

Monitor: Gigabyte AORUS AD27QD Freesync HDR400 1440P

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The list states who and when is flying over Baltic States... since LT joined NATO

I know :D but I think it was supposed to be an argument against what I said (like the list was self-explanatory) and I don't get it.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know :D but I think it was supposed to be an argument against what I said (like the list was self-explanatory) and I don't get it.

 

Either he was trying to show you that there have been Europeans policing European air space OR he was trying point out how much US kit the Europeans are using for said policing. Both make sense as a retort based on what you posted. :noexpression:

 

Again, just my take. No comment here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Either he was trying to show you that there have been Europeans policing European air space .

 

Correct :)

 

Ps;

Russia will be in NATO (in future) probably that you want to learn at schools Chinese...obligatoril ;)


Edited by Kusch

Give me "flying telephone pole" (SA-2)!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We do not help ourself by sealing us in (EU). Cooperation is the future...

Exactly what I said.

 

"Either he was trying to show you that there have been Europeans policing European air space"

 

Correct :)

 

Ps;

Russia will be in NATO (in future) probably that you want to learn at schools Chinese...obligatoril ;)

Well yes, I know, we simply expressed discontent with the fact that it was their turn. I thought that was obvious.

 

Russia in NATO... I just can't see that happening for quite a while. :noexpression:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...