GGTharos Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 Okay, two things: 1) I'm in favor of reasonably common implementations in the sim. 2) Statements of statement by pilots that offer no real value are well, not valuable. It's like when they were saying 'The AMRAAM sucks' but would never answer why. Basically, useless info other than a prompt to continue digging. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Reminder: SAM = Speed Bump :D I used to play flight sims like you, but then I took a slammer to the knee - Yoda
Fri13 Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 (edited) On 6/2/2021 at 6:59 PM, Harlikwin said: Its one of those things that you think to yourself. No one caught THIS in testing? My expectations gets lower and lower by reading these revelations... It wouldn't be bad if all would be in stable and Open Beta would be testing ground for few hundred specialists to check and confirm things... But when open beta is the main branch that is pushed for marketing, it causes negativity to PR. Edited June 12, 2021 by Fri13 i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S. i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.
Fri13 Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 5 minutes ago, GGTharos said: 2) Statements of statement by pilots that offer no real value are well, not valuable. It's like when they were saying 'The AMRAAM sucks' but would never answer why. Basically, useless info other than a prompt to continue digging. i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S. i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.
dorianR666 Posted June 12, 2021 Posted June 12, 2021 19 minutes ago, Harlikwin said: Link to vid? 24 minutes ago, Hobel said: do you have links to this topic hi there were several threads about this in the past, tho naturally i dont remember their urls or titles. i have found someone posting a screenshot of it, but ill try to recover the video again. 1 CPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X GPU: AMD RX 580
Harker Posted June 13, 2021 Posted June 13, 2021 Oh no, why'd you guys have to remind me about the RWR? No INS integration, wrong threat ring logic (only locking targets are promoted to the lethal band) and the filters aren't implemented... 4 The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord. F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3 - i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro
Kev2go Posted June 13, 2021 Posted June 13, 2021 (edited) 4 hours ago, Harlikwin said: I mean an ALR-67v(1,2,3) is an ALR-67v(1,2,3) They are gonna "work the same", maybe in some cases integration with displays "might be different". But thats beyond my paygrade. Thats interesting. Link to vid? He has a point. the ALR 67 ECP 510 ( aka ALR 67 V2) is what he described is that the INS integration. should basically work with the RWR, change the direction of the threats as you move your aircraft, but right now sometimes you can loose RWR contacts if you happen to turn at an angle where your RWR sensor is out of the fov of a radar threat. A 2005 era hornet would be using ALR 67 V2. The AV8B has this feature. right now the Hornet ALR 67 behaves more like a pre ecp510. Edited June 13, 2021 by Kev2go Build: Windows 10 64 bit Pro Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD, WD 1TB HDD
Recommended Posts