Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm a bit confused. What does the vid of flying kestrel have to do with DCS P-47 (even though it's a cool vid I admit)? 

i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.

Posted (edited)

Just something obvious,about the art of fly.The most of players complain and moan because the game is too sensitive.

Imagine a game able to reproduce the kestrel flight,with all feathers independants and something coded to get that actionable.How much of us could be able to manage the stuff?,

Nobody  i think.!!
In the game many players forget a lot of things that are coded,and it give a feeling weird if you are not aware and have a knowledge of what is the flight.
Somewhere else i made an attempt to explain why the trim controls seem so difficult.On the P47 D maybe and other warbirds.
The players acclaim to get a simulation more and more close to real.Unfortunatly the more the game is close to real the more players complain because they have  wrong notions of flight,and imagine that should be like the shoot'em up that they  use usually.
With the kestrel flight ,i show what is the perfection and try to explain that it is not within our reach.
Of course a P47D is a little bit big than a kestrel,:)

But basicaly it uses the same physics and aerodynamics.
We human have to enjoy that some levers make us able to manage an aircraft and it's partially coded in our games.
But we have to have the knowledge of that before complaining.

Edited by cromhunt
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Thats from the USAF museum in Dayton, outstanding place everyone here should see.

"You see, IronHand is my thing"

My specs:  W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...