Anti armor infantry

[FlankerKiller]

infantry, and LMGs. A tone of WWII was infantry fighting infantry. There were AT wepons on both sides by 1944, and alot of them. Same for automatic rifles/LMGs. Pleas make them for the allied and axis armies. Most of the close air support we should be doing would be to weaken infantry positions, not necessarily trying to kill tanks directly. Also having infantry that can kill the tanks is a good way to give armored fighting vehicles equipped with machine guns a purpose. Your first infantry had AT troops, and LMG troops. And your WWII models are spectacularly detailed. I'm at a loss as to why the iconic bazooka, panzershrek, bren gun, Browning automatic rifle, and the true icon the MG42 are not included. As someone who prefers to build missions where I'm a cog in a much larger picture, having or not having these type of infantry units completely changes the way the game is played, and the way missions are built.

Edited January 14, 2022 by FlankerKiller

[FlankerKiller]

infantry, and LMGs. A tone of WWII was infantry fighting infantry. There were AT wepons on both sides by 1944, and alot of them. Same for automatic rifles/LMGs. Pleas make them for the allied and axis armies. Most of the close air support we should be doing should be to weaken infantry positions, not necessarily trying to kill tanks directly. Also having infantry that can kill the tanks is a good way to give armored fighting vehicles equipped with machine guns a purpose. Your or first infantry had AT troops, and LMG troops. And your WWII models are spectacularly detailed. I'm at a loss as to why the iconic bazooka, panzershrek, bren gun, Browning automatic rifle, and the true icon the mg42 are not included. As someone who prefers to build missions where I'm a cog and a much larger picture, having and not having these type of infantry units completely changes the way the game is played in the way missions are built. Please make the infantry relevant again. 

[Callsign112]

+1

[Grievo]

+1

[BIGNEWY]

merged double post

[FlankerKiller]

4 hours ago, BIGNEWY said:

merged double post

Yeah, I don't know what happened there. Some kind of glitch when I tried to post the first time. So I reposted. 

[Mogster]

On 1/14/2022 at 4:42 PM, FlankerKiller said:

infantry, and LMGs. A tone of WWII was infantry fighting infantry. There were AT wepons on both sides by 1944, and alot of them. Same for automatic rifles/LMGs. Pleas make them for the allied and axis armies. Most of the close air support we should be doing should be to weaken infantry positions, not necessarily trying to kill tanks directly. Also having infantry that can kill the tanks is a good way to give armored fighting vehicles equipped with machine guns a purpose. Your or first infantry had AT troops, and LMG troops. And your WWII models are spectacularly detailed. I'm at a loss as to why the iconic bazooka, panzershrek, bren gun, Browning automatic rifle, and the true icon the mg42 are not included. As someone who prefers to build missions where I'm a cog and a much larger picture, having and not having these type of infantry units completely changes the way the game is played in the way missions are built. Please make the infantry relevant again. 

And the PIAT for UK and commonwealth.

[BIGNEWY]

1 hour ago, FlankerKiller said:

Yeah, I don't know what happened there. Some kind of glitch when I tried to post the first time. So I reposted. 

no worries