ED Team Yo-Yo Posted December 19, 2008 ED Team Posted December 19, 2008 Any reasoning behind why Torque isn't used? I guess it is because of failure to develop splitted shaft with non-contact data picking from the tenzo-sensor. May be it was a decision to make design more chip and robust, who knows... Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
ED Team Yo-Yo Posted December 19, 2008 ED Team Posted December 19, 2008 For the moment in BS, there is no overstressing of the engine operating at take-off power. There is outstressing but at very low level and it is not noticeable in one mission. I can imagine the situation when somebody flyes at full throttle for hours making pit-stops for refueling... and the performance of the engine will slightly degrade indeed. Ніщо так сильно не ранить мозок, як уламки скла від розбитих рожевих окулярів There is nothing so hurtful for the brain as splinters of broken rose-coloured spectacles. Ничто так сильно не ранит мозг, как осколки стекла от разбитых розовых очков (С) Me
bradmick Posted December 19, 2008 Author Posted December 19, 2008 The easiest way to explain how torque is measured on my aircrafts engines, there's a tube that goes through the drive shaft and as a load is put on the engine, it twists. The twist is exactly equal to the amount of torque being put on the system and is read on the Np (power turbine) section of the engine. Not very heavy, or complicated. Brad
AlphaOneSix Posted December 19, 2008 Posted December 19, 2008 After having the chance to work on Russian, European, and American helicopters, the best way to explain it is just as a simple difference in design philosophy. I am relatively sure it has nothing to do with technology or weight or even simplicity. There are just so many other differences that can only be explained by differences in design philosophy. Also, the TV3-117 series of engines powers 27% of all the world's helicopters. Fun trivia to drop at parties. ;)
ThunderChief Posted December 20, 2008 Posted December 20, 2008 Yesterday I flew in mountain area and was flying @~4000m and playing around with the shkval and didn't monitor the engine gauges. But suddendly I lost both engines how can that be? I managed to get one engine startet right before I would have impacted the ground, so the engines were still working, must have been some kind of overload ... ?
RvETito Posted December 20, 2008 Posted December 20, 2008 Not very likely. Do you have a track? "See, to me that's a stupid instrument. It tells what your angle of attack is. If you don't know you shouldn't be flying." - Chuck Yeager, from the back seat of F-15D at age 89. =RvE=
Bucic Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Also, the TV3-117 series of engines powers 27% of all the world's helicopters. Fun trivia to drop at parties. ;) :) F-5E simpit cockpit dimensions and flight controls Kill the Bloom - shader glow mod Poor audio Doppler effect in DCS [bug] Trees - huge performance hit especially up close
arneh Posted January 7, 2009 Posted January 7, 2009 Also, the TV3-117 series of engines powers 27% of all the world's helicopters. Fun trivia to drop at parties. ;) Is that 27% of the types of helicopter, or 27% of actual helicopters? If it's the latter then I'm guessing the more than 10 000 Mi-8/Mi-17s make up a huge part of that :) Probably more than all other types using the engine combined?
d0ppler Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Yesterday I flew in mountain area and was flying @~4000m and playing around with the shkval and didn't monitor the engine gauges. But suddendly I lost both engines how can that be? I managed to get one engine startet right before I would have impacted the ground, so the engines were still working, must have been some kind of overload ... ? My guess is that you didn't watch the EKRAN telling you to turn on Rotor Anti-Ice either. A-10C, AV-8B, Ka-50, F-14B, F-16C, F-5E, F/A-18C, L-39, Mi-8, MiG-21, MiG-29, SA34, Spitfire, Su-27, Su-33, UH-1H
AlphaOneSix Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Is that 27% of the types of helicopter, or 27% of actual helicopters? The latter. If it's the latter then I'm guessing the more than 10 000 Mi-8/Mi-17s make up a huge part of that :) Probably more than all other types using the engine combined? Probably! :D
Bucic Posted April 15, 2009 Posted April 15, 2009 Is'nt torque measuring equipment rather complicated? I mean a dynamometer is not appropriate, given that it absorbs all the power that the engine produces. :) I would guess that it is measured by torsion of some drive-train part, which i imagine would be rather complicated. Edit: Well i just read a little and have found, that torque measurement works indeed with strain gauges, which is not that difficult to realise but may be too fragile for russian military doctrine(?). I can tell you that the torque-meters on some Eurocopters consists of two not very complicated metal sleeves with "crowns" and a hall sensor :) F-5E simpit cockpit dimensions and flight controls Kill the Bloom - shader glow mod Poor audio Doppler effect in DCS [bug] Trees - huge performance hit especially up close
Coolhnd1 Posted April 15, 2009 Posted April 15, 2009 Also, the TV3-117 series of engines powers 27% of all the world's helicopters. Fun trivia to drop at parties. ;) I've heard worse pickup lines.:smilewink: -- CoolHand
Recommended Posts