Dallenbach Posted January 31 Posted January 31 vor 21 Minuten schrieb GeorgeVB: Maybe it's worth discussing the plane in the topic and not writing fictions about a country where you haven't been? If you read the following post from him I think he knows what he is writing about and it is not fiction. It would be worth reading the whole thread.
GeorgeVB Posted January 31 Posted January 31 I will be happy to write what I consider fiction and what is not, but the topic is about an airplane!
Joe1978 Posted January 31 Posted January 31 Back to the original topic. I would prefer a MiG23 by ED rather than RB. With ED we would have a relatively constant flow of updates while with RB it would be in danger of being abandoned at any time (as they have done with their other modules before the dispute with ED). Now that we have maps of Iraq and Iran, some good campaigns could be made on those maps... and of course I would love a map of Angola/South Africa. 6 .
pepin1234 Posted February 1 Posted February 1 we must keep Hopes up!! Hey guys good news. Finally ED is doing something positive for Redfor. They show work in progress of the Mig-29A (1982) and they rework the Su-25A and will be free as a simple CAS. So NO MIG-23 FULL FIDELITY, BUT AT LEAST THEY WORKED HARD ON THEIR SIDE… Neither the Helmet and Su-25 lovely rework could make any difference to fix the huge overpowered situation they made themself in DCS https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1ANYewr1ci/?mibextid=wwXIfr https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1B4bNjkEqG/?mibextid=wwXIfr 3 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Joe1978 Posted February 1 Posted February 1 I'm glad...I hope ED (and other 3rd parties) realize that, with the number of modules we have currently (all western), Soviet aircraft are a goldmine to exploit: Mig23/27, Su15, Su17/22, Su27... and why not? a Mig25 (one of my fetishes). They would probably sell like hotcakes. I would also like ED to reissue the MiG21 or the MiG19 (or Deka to make a Chinese version). EMO Magnitude and RB leave a lot to be desired. 8 1 .
Czar66 Posted February 2 Posted February 2 On 2/1/2025 at 10:14 AM, Joe1978 said: a Mig25 (one of my fetishes) Pre-purchase buy, for me. Clean config, full fuel load, empty map, that's all I need on it. 3
karapus78 Posted February 2 Posted February 2 On 1/31/2025 at 12:43 AM, MAXsenna said: Not picking a fight, while these are assumptions on your part. Exactly my thoughts. Cool, I always thought it was the Cubans. We will probably see the Su-27 next, if the MiG-29 sells well. ED moderators have stated as much. Then an Su-25 perhaps? Personally I have feeling these "laws" were just a convenient way to say "No" at the time. That's the way it was. Stories of secrecy as a way to make excuses when you see outright reluctance. That's all there is to it. 3
Recommended Posts