virgo47 Posted September 27, 2023 Posted September 27, 2023 During this training mission, I was previously informed I could use Num+ keys OR the throttle axis to increase the throttle. I hardly know where the keys for the throttle actually are - I'm always using the axis. And then I get to the RWY centerline and I'm informed about the RPM 70% test. I check everything and lower the RPM and... nothing happens. If I press Num- at this moment, nothing happens either, I have to get the RPM a bit higher, then press Num- for the mission to progress. The event should not be bound to using the keys only, especially after I had the freedom of choice previously (which was the right thing, of course). 1 L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
Flappie Posted October 13, 2023 Posted October 13, 2023 (edited) Hi @virgo47. At first, I could not make it work, I'm not sure why. I tried again, still using my Warthog throttle, and it worked... Edited October 13, 2023 by Flappie ---
virgo47 Posted October 14, 2023 Author Posted October 14, 2023 8 hours ago, Flappie said: Hi @virgo47. At first, I could not make it work, I'm not sure why. I tried again, still using my Warthog throttle, and it worked... So it is flaky somehow? I'll get back to this and provide the trackfile, it was pretty reproducible in my case, I could repeat the test a few times and nothing, but I'll double-check and get back to you. L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
Flappie Posted October 14, 2023 Posted October 14, 2023 Thanks. On my end, I'll try to understand how the mission script was made. ---
Solution virgo47 Posted October 15, 2023 Author Solution Posted October 15, 2023 I'm totally puzzled now. I tried today and couldn't reproduce it either, although previously I definitely managed to repeat it a couple of times - otherwise, I would not be able to figure out the "workaround" and I'd not dare to report it. So I guess it's "cannot reproduce" for now. Sorry about it. If you see something suspicious in the script, cool, but while I'm not 100% sure it's OK, I can't do more about it now. L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
Flappie Posted October 16, 2023 Posted October 16, 2023 Let's do it scientifically, then. Here are the conditions to trigger the next action: The flag "12" gets activated by the previous step, which means it is out of the equation. The X:Cockpit argument is the one checking the gauge. And... last but not least, you need to be inside a zone. Chances are we had the issue because we were out of the zone. 1 1 ---
virgo47 Posted October 16, 2023 Author Posted October 16, 2023 (edited) This makes sense! The zone is quite small - if the graphic is precise - because it is quite likely I aligned just in front of the numbers 09! I'm not sure if the zone can be enlarged without triggering lots of QA on your side, but I'd suggest to cover the wider area - e.g. anything fromt he start of the runway for the most "borderline" pilots. What could have happened when it did not work with the axis and then worked with the +/- binds is that I moved a bit, just to get to the zone. If it checks the gauge (and not the binding) it is generally the right logic. Thanks, Flappie, this all makes sense. EDIT: Why can't I remove/change the "solution" mark? Or is it possible somehow? Edited October 16, 2023 by virgo47 1 L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
Flappie Posted October 16, 2023 Posted October 16, 2023 You're welcome. I agree, the zone is a tad too small. I'll ask for a fix. I believe only moderators can change the green "solved" answer, but that's OK. 1 ---
virgo47 Posted October 26, 2023 Author Posted October 26, 2023 I can confirm it works well and the zone in the mission editor looks great too. Thank you very much! 2 L-39, F-4E, F-5E, F-14, F/A-18C, MiG-15, F-86F, AJS-37, C-101, FC2024 Yak-52, P-47, Spitfire, CE2 UH-1H, Mi-8, Ka-50 III, SA342 NTTR, PG, SY, Chnl, Norm2, Kola, DE Supercarrier, NS430, WWII, CA VKB STECS+Gladiator/Kosmosima+TPR DCS Unscripted YouTube "Favourite" bugs: 1) Object local camera fast/slow inverted, 2) Yak-52 toggles not toggling, 3) all Caucasus ATC bugs
Recommended Posts