Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Before the latest patch, and according to the manual, RUK WEZ on the HAD should be the smallest. However it is currently showing that it could hit a target further than EOM and PB.

Posted (edited)

From Wags video (4:00), we can clearly see that the RUK WEZ is smaller than EOM's and could not reach as far as PB on the HAD display.

 

 

However on my track you will be able to see that currently, the RUK WEZ has the potential to hit targets farther than PB and EOM as displayed on the HAD which is in contradiction to what Wags video is showing and the F-16 documentation.

RUK BUG.trk

Thanks for looking into this @Lord Vader

 

MADDOG

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by DCSMADDOG
Posted
vor einer Stunde schrieb DCSMADDOG:

From Wags video, we can clearly see that the RUK WEZ is smaller than EOM's and could not reach as far as PB.

See the bug report, there is basically no difference between 3 modes that changes the behavior of the AGM-88.
it is always active 40nm before target and 180°Seeker search Area
 

 

Posted
23 minutes ago, Hobel said:

See the bug report, there is basically no difference between 3 modes that changes the behavior of the AGM-88.
it is always active 40nm before target and 180°Seeker search Area
 

 

What I am describing is different. I am referring to the size of the WEZ for each POS submode on the HAD. In Wags video and in the F-16 manual, RUK submode has the shortest WEZ du to its inability to loft. Currently, the RUK WEZ representation on the HAD is the largest of all 3 submodes which is wrong.

Posted
vor 2 Minuten schrieb DCSMADDOG:

What I am describing is different. I am referring to the size of the WEZ for each POS submode on the HAD. In Wags video and in the F-16 manual, RUK submode has the shortest WEZ du to its inability to loft. Currently, the RUK WEZ representation on the HAD is the largest of all 3 submodes which is wrong.

ah now I've got it, will look

Posted
On 4/19/2024 at 3:11 AM, Lord Vader said:

I've added your findings to the previous report. We're still working on these modes and expect a future correction.

Thanks for understanding.

Thank you!

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...