MOZA MTP Throttle Panel

[rapid]

Moza is releasing a slew of flight sim Gear.

Their MOZA MTP Throttle Panel has a rumble feed back included in it.

We are getting spoiled for choice now will help level out pricing a bit.

 

[Aapje]

Magnetic detents too. And the metal throttle body will probably appeal to many.

[SharpeXB]

What’s always disappointing to me with these high-end throttles is they try to emulate the actual ones and the result is they don’t have enough buttons on them. And if anyone flies different aircraft why would you want a Hornet specific device? Real aircraft don’t need a zoom view axis and such. Like I don’t have a use for all the switches and knobs for the side panel. And no use for dual throttles. I just want more buttons on the handle itself where they’re more useful. I’ll just keep the CH forever

Edited March 18 by SharpeXB

[VR Flight Guy in PJ Pants]

2 hours ago, Aapje said:

Magnetic detents too. And the metal throttle body will probably appeal to many.

Too bad the detents are not physically adjustable. I am happy with what I am having so, I would give it a pass. Well it is for all other FFB products anyway.

We definitely need a Moza sub-forum.

[Aapje]

Yeah, the review I saw didn't make me regret getting a STECS.

@SharpeXB I also prefer 'fantasy' controllers that are made to be jacks of all trade, masters of none, so it works well for many games and types of airplanes.

Edited March 19 by Aapje

[VR Flight Guy in PJ Pants]

13 minutes ago, Aapje said:

Yeah, the review I saw didn't make me regret getting a STECS

There can't be 2 views here. I am using the minimal version and the customisation is bar none.

[AR_Parker]

It's nice to have options. Personally I would probably go for a stecs to the small virpil. It's awesome that more companies are starting to jump on the flight sim train.

[rapid]

10 hours ago, Aapje said:

Yeah, the review I saw didn't make me regret getting a STECS.

@SharpeXB Yeah, I also prefer 'fantasy' controllers that are made to be jacks of all trade, masters of none, so it works well for many games and types of airplanes.

Nice piece the STECS, I still think the T.M Warthog Throttle can be easily utilised for other Air Frames. I love it after all these years I also use a Virpil Button Box#2.

Which is my "Fantasy controller"

Still a decent try by Moza, think they may be the first to give a player a "Throbbing" Thruster in their hands.

[MAXsenna]

Nice piece the STECS, I still think the T.M Warthog Throttle can be easily utilised for other Air Frames. I love it after all these years I also use a Virpil Button Box#2.
Which is my "Fantasy controller"
Still a decent try by Moza, think they may be the first to give a player a "Throbbing" Thruster in their hands.

Yeah, my Warthog fits most airframes, and I have my Cougar for the Viper and the Jeff. I do see why people would like a more "modern" throttle though.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

[VR Flight Guy in PJ Pants]

I tried the newer TM Viper throttle but it broke in a very specular fashion, featuring FedEx. So I settle for a WinWing. I would say STECS works with any jet with two engines, some time with chopter too. Sorry very OT.

[rapid]

On 3/19/2025 at 9:05 AM, MAXsenna said:

Yeah, my Warthog fits most airframes, and I have my Cougar for the Viper and the Jeff. I do see why people would like a more "modern" throttle though.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
 

That is a fair comment  I agree with you.

[bilbosmeggins]

On 3/18/2025 at 8:22 PM, VR Flight Guy in PJ Pants said:

Too bad the detents are not physically adjustable. I am happy with what I am having so, I would give it a pass. Well it is for all other FFB products anyway.

We definitely need a Moza sub-forum.

I thought the detents were adjustable. They certainly seem to be according to this video at 2.55 

 

Edited April 15 by bilbosmeggins
Typo

[Strale]

I got it regardless some not completely nice reviews.
against the WW (orion1 that i still have) and TM (that was sold a couple of years ago) 
I have to admit that the very bad thing about this throttle is the afterburner detent.
The unit is sold with 3 installed detent, Cut-off, one in the middle i really don't have any clue of the meaning, and the afterburner.
I immediately removed the center one, moved a little bit aft the cut-off and i'm satisfied with it. Main issue is the Afterburner.
The AFT are engaged at approximately the 30/35% of the travel on the detent... making it completely useless.
you could of course play with the curves but you will loose a good amount of travel... so actually no joy ! 

I read somewhere that the problem can be easily fixed with a dremel and cutting part of the aft detent which for the moment i don't have any intention to do.

I addressed Moza's customer support and they were very kind and quick on answer but so far no news from them.

What i like most of this throttle is that eventually they avoided to put switches on the righs side of the throttle's handles and that will be usefull when i will install
into the pit. TM and WW shifted too much of the left the throttles grip just to put switches and making ergonomics very very bad.

If someone ever made a 3D custom detent for it i would have interest to try it.

 

[rapid]

What's the FFB like ...if any?

[MAXsenna]

What's the FFB like ...if any?

Doesn't have it, neither will the pedals. Both of which surprises me.

Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

[Strale]

6 ore fa, rapid ha scritto:

What's the FFB like ...if any?

First it's not a FFB but should or it's declared to be a tactile feeedback (teoretically the grips should "tremble" but only in some particular situations ... for example
during a Stall) anyway even if in the software i set the force at maximum so far i didn't experienced any "trembling" on my hand.
I got the throttle with the default firmware and also the cut-off and aftburner switches were not responding .. update to latest available firmware and, at least, they're working
think the tactile feedback will be implemented as for now i didn't experience it.

 

[rapid]

Yup!

I did use the wrong phrase just got caught up in the moment  of FFB been tossed around.

I was referring to this>>"Built-in vibration feedback enhances immersion by simulating real-world flight effects"