Roadmap of Mi-24p ?

[kotor633]

vor 6 Stunden schrieb BIGNEWY:

yes, unfortunately we have a back log currently.

Yes, absolutely.

[Stratos]

4 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

 

Why would we, as users, need those?  .. I have no interest on managing a software company, I just want to have a proper manual to study the module.

You maybe don't want to know, but I do. Thanks.

[MirabelleBenou]

I agree that a quick list would be usefull. At least, it'll show us that the team have plans for the Mi-24. Not asking for a time of implementation or any engagement or guarantee, just that, yeah, the team is aware some things need to be added/corrected.

@BIGNEWY Do you think that would be feasible/acceptable ? Even inside a locked thread. Thanks.

[kotor633]

I don't quite understand why they publish a roadmap for the F-16, F-18, and AH-64 with features they plan to implement. And then continually update this list as soon as a feature is implemented. But that doesn't exist for the Mi-24.

[Raven (Elysian Angel)]

Indeed, and the Mini Updates thread hasn’t gotten an Update in almost 3 years…

[Raffi75]

On 7/27/2025 at 11:27 PM, kotor633 said:

I don't quite understand why they publish a roadmap for the F-16, F-18, and AH-64 with features they plan to implement. And then continually update this list as soon as a feature is implemented. But that doesn't exist for the Mi-24.

Perhaps it's because the F-16, F-18, and Ah-64 are in active service and thus have a chance to attract more new customers. The Mi-24, having long since outlived its glory days, is no longer attractive to new generations. It remains a target for enthusiasts and lovers of Soviet engineering, and therefore, is no longer as profitable. That's my thought.

Edited Wednesday at 01:27 AM by Raffi75

[Raven (Elysian Angel)]

And simply by not being a ‘BlueFor flying calculator’ makes it less attractive to the general audience