InsaneHexe Posted Wednesday at 07:49 PM Posted Wednesday at 07:49 PM (edited) With the update on the 21.05.25 we got AAW and Hospital Markers on the map. While a neat idea this leads to two issues: Firstly it can lead ot confusion for players as they see SAM or EWR markers even if the mission has nothing there. Secondly and more important it causes issues for mission editor, as the markers are very big, do not scale very well and most importantly are not see through. So the only options are to either hide the "building" layer (which will also hide all buildings) or work exclusively in satellite mode. While fully removing them might not be in the interest of the developer I would suggest taking inspiration by the Sinai map as it already has a very similar feature. Scaling better with zoomlevel and being partially see through. . Edited Wednesday at 07:57 PM by InsaneHexe all the text magically disappeared 11 1
GenericUser Posted Wednesday at 10:22 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:22 PM SAM markers are nice to have, but personally Id rather not have them over this implementation. The Map is already super cluttered with all the helipad markers, so blocking places entirely like this is adding to an existing problem. Fingers crossed for a fix soon.
Red_Camarada Posted Wednesday at 10:57 PM Posted Wednesday at 10:57 PM please ugra make like OP said, the markers are a welcome feature but they do clutter a little, if they shrink with zoom levels would be really great 1
Thunder Chicken22 Posted Wednesday at 11:39 PM Posted Wednesday at 11:39 PM 1 hour ago, GenericUser said: SAM markers are nice to have, but personally Id rather not have them over this implementation. The Map is already super cluttered with all the helipad markers, so blocking places entirely like this is adding to an existing problem. Fingers crossed for a fix soon. This. Really wish there is a way to declutter all the labels in general. Maybe only show helipad names when zoomed way in.
OneEyeRoss Posted Thursday at 03:05 AM Posted Thursday at 03:05 AM OK, and this is just me spitballing here: We knew where the SAM sites were....they were very evident. And not knowing if they were active or had been moved in the days prior to the balloon going up was part of the problem (same with the GSFG, which was my thing to worry about). So, if it leads to a bit of pucker factor, welcome to the immersion. Embrace the suck.
InsaneHexe Posted Thursday at 03:57 AM Author Posted Thursday at 03:57 AM Another one of my complains is that while some SAMsites are modeled, others are not. Aswell as non of the SAM sites looking remotely what they are supposed too. The SA5 sites especially are absolute eye-sores with how huge and out of place they seem. nullWe spent the better part of the last month creating a SAM network based on data we could find online and a good chunk of the SAMsites are no reflected correctly ingame. There is also a SA5 site down south near Fulda that we found no information on( Grid NB81 should be an EWR site from what we found. Also Grid UV87 shows a SAM marker but contains no site Every colored dot is a SAMsite. Type based on color.
Trigger Posted Thursday at 01:06 PM Posted Thursday at 01:06 PM Same on my side - those SAM symbols are definitely no help, the way they are shown. Why not translucent or at least much smaller. Momentarily, they are just disturbing big time. Win 10/64 Pro, Asus ROG Z390-E 1151 v2, Intel Core i7-9700K@3,60 GHz, RTX 4070 Ti Super Phoenix GS 64 GB, DCS: NVMe SSD 970 EVO 1TB, Maps: SSD870 EVO 1TB, Cougar HOTAS (U2nxt) modified, Simpeds, TIR 5
Essah Posted Thursday at 03:11 PM Posted Thursday at 03:11 PM (edited) 11 hours ago, InsaneHexe said: Another one of my complains is that while some SAMsites are modeled, others are not. Aswell as non of the SAM sites looking remotely what they are supposed too. The SA5 sites especially are absolute eye-sores with how huge and out of place they seem. They are actually exactly as they should be source: https://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-SAM-Site-Configs-A.html#mozTocId491769 Keep in mind there wouldn't have been this many trees at the time it was in use. Edited Thursday at 03:11 PM by Essah
Blackbahia Posted Thursday at 05:57 PM Posted Thursday at 05:57 PM vor 13 Stunden schrieb InsaneHexe: Another one of my complains is that while some SAMsites are modeled, others are not. Aswell as non of the SAM sites looking remotely what they are supposed too. The SA5 sites especially are absolute eye-sores with how huge and out of place they seem. nullWe spent the better part of the last month creating a SAM network based on data we could find online and a good chunk of the SAMsites are no reflected correctly ingame. There is also a SA5 site down south near Fulda that we found no information on( Grid NB81 should be an EWR site from what we found. Also Grid UV87 shows a SAM marker but contains no site Every colored dot is a SAMsite. Type based on color. I can't find any information on the SAM site in NB80 either
Schmidtfire Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago (edited) Use the Layers Filter to declutter the map and select what symbols to display: Edited 5 hours ago by Schmidtfire
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now