lee1hy Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago (edited) You can see big big square moving target shown f-16gmt radar big big square on the F16 GMT radar . Is this realistic or is it incorrect? game F-16C Real Edited 15 hours ago by lee1hy kim_123456#3214 My awesome liveries user files https://shorturl.at/cdKV5
Solution RogueSpecterGaming Posted 11 hours ago Solution Posted 11 hours ago 3 hours ago, lee1hy said: You can see big big square moving target shown f-16gmt radar big big square on the F16 GMT radar . Is this realistic or is it incorrect? game F-16C Real Your "F-16C real" photo is from a much earlier version of the F16C and most likely a much earlier version of the radar as well. And who knows if what we are looking at has moving targets on it. I think the squares a bit too big personally, but not too far off. 2 My PC: GPU-AMD 6800XT OC / CPU- AMD RYZEN 5800X OC / 32 GB RAM 3200Mhz / 1TB SSD / 2TB HDD / 500GB M.2 / Monitor: 34" Ultrawide Samsung 1000R Curve / WinWing F16EX HOTAS / TM Cougar MFDs / TM TPR Rudder Pedals / TrackIR5 / ICP
lee1hy Posted 7 hours ago Author Posted 7 hours ago (edited) https://www.scribd.com/document/678844678/APG-68 NOT "earlier version " ITS APG-68 V5 4 hours ago, RogueSpecterGaming said: Your "F-16C real" photo is from a much earlier version of the F16C and most likely a much earlier version of the radar as well. And who knows if what we are looking at has moving targets on it. I think the squares a bit too big personally, but not too far off. If you want to check "correct as is", please bring a source material Thanks Edited 7 hours ago by lee1hy kim_123456#3214 My awesome liveries user files https://shorturl.at/cdKV5
Ivandrov Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) 33 minutes ago, lee1hy said: https://www.scribd.com/document/678844678/APG-68 NOT "earlier version " ITS APG-68 V5 If you want to check "correct as is", please bring a source material Thanks The person who checks "correct as is" is usually the the ED team. I don't know what any of this in the 2nd post has to do with the GMT blocks, the image in your first post as blurry as it is certainly looks like big ass blocks to me. Edited 6 hours ago by Ivandrov
Hobel Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago (edited) vor einer Stunde schrieb lee1hy: https://www.scribd.com/document/678844678/APG-68 NOT "earlier version " ITS APG-68 V5 If you want to check "correct as is", please bring a source material Thanks And where in your source does the GMT representation contradict that in DCS? It is a symbolic simplification to make the moving target more recognizable to the pilot amid the noise. The representation in DCS is correct. Edited 6 hours ago by Hobel
Recommended Posts