FC 2.0?? su27 vs f15???

[SEwhiteG]

 

Just look at online tracks. The same people claiming the their planes are inferior shoot their missiles in every direction in the hopes of getting someone withtin the seekers reach.

 

 

 

These people about whom you talk at least go so close to the enemy, and trying to make kill from normal range.

I am sorry that I dont have anymore a Tac view where clearly we can see you how fireing 5 AIM-120 from 50km and turning back in the hope that you will hit something.

[Pilotasso]

white G if you accusing me of maddoging get a clue. learn fly F15's before spewing that crap.

[Eddie]

LMFAO!!!

 

Thanks guys, I've e-mailed this thread to a load of my old F4 buddy's and it's given us quite a laugh. I'll be bookmarking it for future amusement. Classic.

 

I suspect a fair few of you look like this..............

 

[124SqZeljava]

LMFAO!!!

 

Thanks guys, I've e-mailed this thread to a load of my old F4 buddy's and it's given us quite a laugh. I'll be bookmarking it for future amusement. Classic.

 

I suspect a fair few of you look like this..............

 

Bro,, u are triping:pilotfly::lol::lol::lol:

[SEwhiteG]

 

Just look at online tracks. The same people claiming the their planes are inferior shoot their missiles in every direction in the hopes of getting someone withtin the seekers reach.

 

 

That was my answer on this post.

 

 

As i said I am sorry that I dont have anymore a Tac view.

Next time i will be more careful, and I will save next Tac view.

[Pilotasso]

Eddie...that is FANBOYsih... We all flight simmers need to stick together and not making fun what each others have. bah.

[Moa]

Sorry I got OT, back on, the F-15 would win in a real life battle or the 27......because it wouldn't get close.

 

That's my understanding. In fact I've heard it quoted as "when they get close we run away like the girls they are". It is not as if Eagle drivers aren't taught to fight in close. It's just they know that their estimated effective kill ratio as officially published by the Pentagon (7:1 vs Su-27) will plummet once the Flankers get close (yes, Flankers are on-par close in, calm down already).

 

Probably Indian Flanker pilots might do better than that ratio, but that number is what was estimated by the Pentagon after flying both aircraft. A lot of it will be electronics and training hours rather than simple performance envelopes.

[SEPanc]

very few fly F-15's only.

 

:lol:

 

 

Ok , then why on Blue Side on this year RED flag , where 18 F15C , and the guys were firing from +40000ft 5 Amraams to a single Su 25T:megalol: ......

 

 

Servers would host the missions 80's , but , lonewolfs can't fly such a thing , ok lolz for mergs , lolz for gunkills , and yet alone is imposible when u have 2 guys on comms and well organized . So tell me if you survived 2 vs 1 29A ....

Edited February 5, 2010 by =SE=Panc

[Reason]

I think we talk about f15c and su27 here?

 

Ok, we can make A2A missions with top10 (maybe top20 = 40 pilots) of both coalitions (su27 vs f15c pilots) and FIGHT ON!

 

Sponsored by ED:music_whistling:

[Pilotasso]

That was my answer on this post.

 

 

As i said I am sorry that I dont have anymore a Tac view.

Next time i will be more careful, and I will save next Tac view.

 

Thats just lame, I fly frequently online, almost every day and you accuse me of maddoging yet, conveniently you have no proof.

 

Me thinks all you got is mouth and little to back that up.

[SEPanc]

Me thinks all you got is mouth and little to back that up.

 

:megalol::megalol:

 

The Joke of the year

[124SqZeljava]

That's my understanding. In fact I've heard it quoted as "when they get close we run away like the girls they are". It is not as if Eagle drivers aren't taught to fight in close. It's just they know that their estimated effective kill ratio as officially published by the Pentagon (7:1 vs Su-27) will plummet once the Flankers get close (yes, Flankers are on-par close in, calm down already).

 

Probably Indian Flanker pilots might do better than that ratio, but that number is what was estimated by the Pentagon after flying both aircraft. A lot of it will be electronics and training hours rather than simple performance envelopes.

Wut!!, pentagon has said that they were on the moon:megalol::megalol::megalol::megalol::megalol: yes, but it was like this:joystick::joystick::joystick::joystick:

[Pilotasso]

:megalol::megalol:

 

The Joke of the year

 

 

excuse me but I have I ever seen you online? Mind your business

[RedTiger]

This Thread ......

 

 

:puke:

 

Fixed it for you.

 

We like our trolls fat and over-fed around here.

[SEPanc]

excuse me but I have I ever seen you online

 

Now 19:03pm European time im on HyperLobby :megalol:

[cool_t]

Its very simple...

 

F-15c....Up-grade F-C 2.0...

 

If Mig/Su pilots want the ET...DATA link...EOS...and have a true "Un-fair" advantage in a "Flight Sim" So be it....youve been flying against the F-C 1.0 F-15c which has botched missiles and a weak power-plant...

 

The ET...has been the corner stone of MANY pilots and should NEVER have been allowed the power it had in F-C 1.0 where the AIM-120/AIM-9 have been reduced to 1/3 of there power...What dont people get about this ??? Im truly lost in thinking that If I was in a Mig/Su shooting down WW2 fighter planes that would make me a "ACE".....or same as if I had a MODERN assault rifle in a fire fight with an enemy that had SPEARS....what is the issue with the NEEDED upgrades of the F-15c and its missiles/radar/powerplant???

 

I didnt know that the Mig-29 radar was as powerful as the F-15c??? Oh but thats F-C 1.0

 

F-15c is getting a DATA LINK in F-C-2.0......

[Renato71]

excuse me but I have I ever seen you online? Mind your business

 

Not a good way to deal with criticism. But, there is nothing new from an old member...

[Udat]

Just wich improvements are you referring to, white?

 

it's been stated repeatedly that only IFF and missile/fligh performance have been fixed. This goes for the russian planes as well (except they have had IFF all along..)

[Udat]

F-15c is getting a DATA LINK in F-C-2.0......

Where did you get that bit of info?

[SEwhiteG]

Thats just lame, I fly frequently online, almost every day and you accuse me of maddoging yet, conveniently you have no proof.

 

Me thinks all you got is mouth and little to back that up.

 

 

LOL

 

I am in my post did not mention any mad dog, and i am not accuseing you.

I just replied to your post.

So if you say that it was a mad dog, then fine.

[SEPanc]

F-15c is getting a DATA LINK in F-C-2.0......

 

And Caucas is going to be Serbia from 1999 , with 200 F15 , stalking sky high and just firing some few ( 10 ) 120ss to a single bandit ......

[Udat]

I don't get what people are so afraid of. The improvements will be added to ALL PLANES! Personally I can't wait to fly the Su-27 with improved ER's.

 

Edit: In fact, I'm making that my new sig.

[Pilotasso]

LOL

 

I am in my post did not mention any mad dog, and i am not accuseing you.

I just replied to your post.

So if you say that it was a mad dog, then fine.

 

since you quoted me on firing in every direction in the hopes of hiting somebody, yes your post is very insinuating.

[MoGas]

I don't get what people are so afraid of. The improvements will be added to ALL PLANES! Personally I can't wait to fly the Su-27 with improved ER's.

 

Edit: In fact, I'm making that my new sig.

 

I believe I know :music_whistling:, some in here getting worried about the hole thing not only the 120`s, in FC2.0 there u need a valid lock for youre missiles and not just a quick climb to 8000m and wooot ET LA or maddog R-77 and split-s away same goes for such F-15 try's but then they see ok thats a shity plane I stay on my MigY with ET and R-77's hehehe.:smilewink:

 

Or all the nice exploits what u can use in the current Lockon, what fits the tactics for them, are gone as well OMG.:helpsmilie:

 

Soo finally I understand it, because damn ;) u have to change the tactic, and those who fly with " at least near too RL BVR tactic" dosent have to change, and u kill them in the current lockon already, soo I really understand.:megalol:

[GGTharos]

The only F-15 specific improvements are:

 

IFF Cue on HUD (hallelujah, it was about time)

Correction of MIL thrust at high altitude (MIL, not AB. Get it?)

 

There seem to be a bunch of you who would like to blow this out of proportion because you either have no clue, or you have an agenda - or both.

 

Missile tweaks have been applied or are being applies as equally across the board as possible.

 

With that in mind, thread locked.