AFM for the F-16C?

[WRAITH]

Well to keep up with modern appearances F-16 Block 50/52 is the best AESA Radar, FCLS, HUD, better avionics updates, JHMCS capable, data link, better weapons loadout and so on.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please watch

 

http://trishulgroup.blogspot.com.au/2009/10/f-16-block-5052-explained.html

 

 

http://www.military-heat.com/52/lockheed-martin-f16-block-505260/

 

 

Da best :thumbup:

Edited June 12, 2012 by WRAITH

[mvsgas]

Well to keep up with modern appearances F-16 Block 50/52 is the best AESA Radar, FCLS, HUD, better avionics updates, JHMCS capable, better weapons loadout etc

 

 

 

 

 

 

Please watch

 

http://trishulgroup.blogspot.com.au/2009/10/f-16-block-5052-explained.html

 

 

http://www.military-heat.com/52/lockheed-martin-f16-block-505260/

 

 

Da best :thumbup:

 

You are already making assumptions;

- They only F-16 I know with an AESA is the block 60.

- The block 50/52 uses DFLCS no FLCS.

- In the USAF, block 40, 42, 50 and 52 should now have the same capabilities, avionics and software.

- Some block 20 A models and 40 and 42 have JHMCS capabilities as well, and some countries with block 50/52 do not.

- Same goes for the weapons load out.

- Just because you fly the block 50/52 does not mean you can carry AGM-88, for example, I'm sure they may have them, but never seen Singapore carry them in practice while in Luke AFB or never seen photos of their 52 with HTS nor AGM-88.

 

All F-16 information depends on the block, the year, country even the tail number in some occasions.

[GGTharos]

I would rather have an F-15C.

[mvsgas]

I would rather have an F-15C.

 

:smartass::D You are going t make me quote Dos gringos again aren't you?

[sungsam]

You are already making assumptions;

- Just because you fly the block 50/52 does not mean you can carry AGM-88, for example, I'm sure they may have them, but never seen Singapore carry them in practice while in Luke AFB or never seen photos of their 52 with HTS nor AGM-88.

 

Mvsgas, you can have a look here.

 

Hellenic F-16 Block 52+ with AGM-88 HARM missile

 

 

http://s7.invisionfree.com/worldconflictsforum/ar/t3727.htm

Edited June 12, 2012 by sungsam

[GGTharos]

I'll quote Shaw at you! :D

 

:smartass::D You are going t make me quote Dos gringos again aren't you?

[mvsgas]

You can have a look here.

 

Hellenic F-16 Block 52+ with AGM-88 HARM missile

 

 

http://s7.invisionfree.com/worldconflictsforum/ar/t3727.htm

 

Read my post please and find a Singapore block 52+ with that load out

[sungsam]

I read your post. I just posted for informational reasons. :huh:

Edited June 12, 2012 by sungsam

[mvsgas]

I'll quote Shaw at you! :D

:D

Yeah, all you ****ers wish you flew the Viper

Probably since the time you wore a diaper

We got every mission that you do

And we fly 'em all better than you

Yeah, all you ****ers wish you flew the Viper

 

'Cause we're single seat, multi-role

We can fly right up our own asshole

Yeah, all you ****ers wish you flew the Viper

[mvsgas]

I read your post. I just posted for informational reasons.

 

Sorry, but how does a Hellenic block 52+ relates to a Singapore block 52+ when my point is and was

All F-16 information depends on the block, the year, country even the tail number in some occasions.

[sungsam]

Why are you torturing me for spreading some info ? I thought you were not sure. :)

[Cedaway]

Sorry but I wondered (looks like a noob question, but...):

 

What is the yellow 'thing' on the left of the picture? In front of the CMS Panel, facing the ejection safety handle. (Like a metal tripod)

 

Canopy safety lock or something like that?

 

[mvsgas]

Why are you torturing me for spreading some info ? I thought you were not sure. :)

 

No my intention, but I quote;

- Just because you fly the block 50/52 does not mean you can carry AGM-88, for example, I'm sure they may have them, but never seen Singapore carry them in practice while in Luke AFB or never seen photos of their 52 with HTS nor AGM-88.

[mvsgas]

Sorry but I wondered (looks like a noob question, but...):

 

What is the yellow 'thing' on the left of the picture? In front of the CMS Panel, facing the ejection safety handle. (Like a metal tripod)

 

Canopy safety lock or something like that?

 

 

Canopy lock handle. I covers the canopy open switch and prevents the hooks from rotating and unlocking the canopy

[Cedaway]

Canopy lock handle. I covers the canopy open switch and prevents the hooks from rotating and unlocking the canopy

 

Thanks :thumbup:

[GGTharos]

There are two types of aircraft: Fighters and Targets.

 

Any Viper with a bomb on board is no longer a fighter :D

 

:D

[mvsgas]

There are two types of aircraft: Fighters and Targets.

 

Any Viper with a bomb on board is no longer a fighter :D

 

Jealousy and envy is just poring out does words. Self loading is transcending thru the web...:D is ok body you can claim to like the F-15, I won't tell people that you really like the F-16 in your hart. :smartass:

Rock beats scissors, scissors beat paper, Robotech beats all :megalol:

[GGTharos]

Actually I never liked the F-16. I don't know why, there's no real, rational reason for it. Much like I don't like Harriers or Su-25's.

 

Maybe it's because F-15's actually do rule or something :D

 

( ... but I agree about Robotech :D )

 

Jealousy and envy is just poring out does words. Self loading is transcending thru the web...:D is ok body you can claim to like the F-15, I won't tell people that you really like the F-16 in your hart. :smartass:

Rock beats scissors, scissors beat paper, Robotech beats all :megalol:

[NineLine]

Actually I never liked the F-16. I don't know why, there's no real, rational reason for it. Much like I don't like Harriers or Su-25's.

 

Maybe it's because F-15's actually do rule or something :D

 

( ... but I agree about Robotech :D )

 

 

Oh gawd... DCS: VF-1J Valkyrie

 

[GGTharos]

I prefer the -25 these days :D

[Sierra99]

There's been a lot of talk about AFM and SFM on the forums. I'm a big fan of the AFM in A-10c and I and about 90% of the community agree that we'd like to see more of the same fidelity. With the amount of countries flying the F-16C (and it's service life), it seems that an AFM would be possible. Am I wrong? And if so please tell me exactly what goes into make the flight model "advanced."

 

OK... I'll bite... What is AFM? And SFM?

[NineLine]

OK... I'll bite... What is AFM? And SFM?

 

Advanced and Simple Flight Model

[NineLine]

I prefer the -25 these days :D

 

I will announce my 3rd Party project of a Robotech Mod, for a demo plane I will start out with Rick Hunter's Fan Jet :D

[Sierra99]

...incidentally, the ANG trainer doesn't even seem to have a 3D pit...yuck :P

 

3d trainers are expensive... Most are what we call "Wooden Indians" little more than high res pictures under plexiglass arraigned so people can pull up their chair and practice checklist procedures. There are a few Pit style procedures trainers...look like a cockpit... More electronics but still no motion or graphics and finally, the full motion sims used for advanced training check rides etc.

 

I have photos of each style on my computer at home and I'm post some later.

 

Gadgets

[Jona33]

I don't know why, there's no real, rational reason for it. Much like I don't like Harriers or Su-25's.

 

Shall I send you endless images with vipers,harriers and su-25's then? :D