Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Lousy attempt at calling the guy out, if Pfarrer is who he says he is. Half of that article was dedicated to poorly proving a rotor-strike. Read the comments below the article.

Posted

The supposed "proof", the trig, depends on where the tail boom hit the wall. If it hit it at the tail wheel strut I think it would be ok. I haven't done the maths but it should possible.

Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing

Posted

The only reason I brought this article up is because of who this guy is.I think it's interesting that the former team leader of ST6 is the one calling foul.

 

Also,The Author of the book "Mark Owen"[pen name] reportedly left the team under Heavy duress and was Dimmed out [His real name leaked] by his old SEAL Team Commandos.

 

I'll be interested in how the upcoming movie "Zero Dark Thirty" portrays the operation.

Patrick

mini.gif

Posted

So how far down the comment below the article will I find that Obama is raised by muslim family? Or that ST6 found bin laden and obama kissing eachother? LOL :D

ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P

Posted

That article you linked to is at foul to.

Here's why;

 

No one came up the stairs past Kalid on to the third floor.
So no one would have been on the 3rd floor. According to the author of this article at least

 

Instead of fast roping, the Black Hawk landed the assaulters directly on the roof, he said. The assaulters then crashed through a two windows onto the Bin Laden’s compartments on the third floor.
Oh wait, looks like he changed his mind, the whole team was on the 3rd floor. Its how they got in.......

 

Really, the guy can't even stick to his own story????:doh:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

The keeper of all mathematical knowledge and the oracle of flight modeling.:)
Posted

Actually Falcon, he's saying no one came up the stairs, they were on the third floor but they didn't go up the stairs, (having smashed a window.)

Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing

Posted
Actually Falcon, he's saying no one came up the stairs, they were on the third floor but they didn't go up the stairs, (having smashed a window.)

 

Ok then, the sentence just infront of it;

“There were no foot prints in the blood on the stairs,”

 

No foot prints in the blood on the stairs, either up our down........

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

The keeper of all mathematical knowledge and the oracle of flight modeling.:)
Posted

Yeah, it's a bit weird, they must have used them to get down so there being no footprints is odd since it's confirmed the son died at the top of the stairs. (The argument being whether he was shot from above or below.)

Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing

Posted

But that just it, though. No bloody footprints. From the account told by the author of No Easy Day to 60 minutes, there would have been bloody footprints all over the place. But there were none. So it doesn't matter if he went up or down those steps because there were no bloody footprints. How do you explain that?

ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P

Posted

Depends if you believe the pfarer when he is clearly on a desperate mission to promote his book.

Always remember. I don't have a clue what I'm doing

Posted

Honestly, after the Bravo Two Zero fiasco, I'm reluctant to believe these high profile type books.

ED have been taking my money since 1995. :P

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...