Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/21/07 in all areas

  1. I guess its because the Su-25UTG doesn't carry any weapons IIRC. So if they did have to mod it, they need to put a hook, add a few changes like an extra seat and remove weapons. In the end, you get an AFM aircraft that could only land and takeoff from aircraft carrier. It would be an awesome training tool, yes, but you are basically training to land in an AFM plane, then move on to an easier plane (Su-33) with SFM lol. Simple answer, it probably won't happen. Cool idea, but i guess its not pratical.
    1 point
  2. Thank you everybody for comments... If you liked my photos so you should check that too. http://forum.lockon.ru/showthread.php?t=23813
    1 point
  3. Of course IRL there is the plane’s silhouette on the HUD in search regime. On real MiG-29 (9-12, 9-13, 9-51) the IPV display works ONLY as a HUD repeater (no matter what regime), with the difference that the far right vertical line where the search area ends is not displayed on the HUD, also the scan area position in the vertical plane is shown only on IPV display, there is the antenna bar number currently scanned where in the same place on the HUD is the gun’s remaining rounds information. On RL Su-27 there is tactical information/ hud repeater option for IPV display, selectable with a switch on IPV, TAKT/DUBL. This switch is also found on some later-series MiG-29, but it does nothing. The other minor difference I know of is that in radar/IRST search regime on Su-27 the plane’s silhouette on the HUD doesn’t have the vertical “tail”, only the wings, but in lock regime, nav and all other there is the “tail” like in MiG-29. Bottom line, the decision to not include in LockOn bank angle on HUD in radar search regime was indeed very silly.
    1 point
  4. Просто посмотри трек в ЛО, файлик под тактиквью создасться в темпе автоматом. Не забудь файлики lua в папку export скопировать.
    1 point
  5. По части ТС: 82.162.142.173:8767 - вэлкам. - на всякий случай, могу зарегать админом кого-нибудь\сдалать закрытые каналы итд итп, если что стучите в аську, пишите в личку, шлите факсы ;) ЗЫ. по МСК могу выходить в сеть в 00-00, но ни как не раньше (у меня это 7 утра, как раз на первом басе добраться до работы %) )
    1 point
  6. Yeah I see your point, its a waste, if only it was a sim it would be worthy of the beauty. This game looks pretty impressive from an arcade point of view though and its bound to influence more fledglings to move onto the next level of being an ubber pilot , be it virtual or real. Personally I can't wait to get AC6 ....for my kids ofcourse.;)
    1 point
  7. I went on the Natural Point forum regarding the problem that I'm having, and its just as I thought, they don't seem to have an answer for Z axis problem that I'm having ... I don't think that they're really to concerned about dealing with this anyway.. I guess they're just like everyone else regarding Flaming Cliff issues.. "Why bother, lets wait for Black Shark to be released".... Anyway I can deal with it for now, I just figured out how to enable Teka Teka's camera adjustment mod.. You just turn user account control off to adjust the settings in config/view/server.lua, and save the changes before exiting.. then you turn the control back on... This gives you a very realistic effect when using it in conjunction with TIR4... ~S~ Blaze
    1 point
  8. I got no news regarding our site :helpsmilie: So where will the REDFOR brief/planning be??
    1 point
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...