Jump to content

59th_Buncsi

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    147

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About 59th_Buncsi

  • Birthday 01/01/1991

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    HELL YEAH DCS: MiG-29 9.12 is coming!!!
    DCS: L-39ZA, MiG-21bis, MiG-15bis, Mi-8MT, Mi-24P, Yak-52, Ka-50 (Blackshark 1, 2 and 3...), Bf-109K4
    FC3: MiG-29A
    Other not daily flown types: Su-27, Su-33, F-14A/B, A-10C (only the original), F-16C, AJS-37, Su-25 and Mirage F.1
    Own and not flown: F/A-18C, Mirage-2000C, P-51, UH-1H, Fw-190D-9, F-86F, L-39C, F-5E and the rest of FC3: (F-15C, A-10A, MiG-29S)
    Can't wait for DCS: MiG-29A/B/UB (9.12 and 9.51), Su-22M3/M4 and Mi-24V/D (Finally we got the P)

    Flew IL-2 1946, Falcon 4, Falcon BMS, MSFSX - now strictly DCS
  • Location
    Hungary
  • Interests
    guitar, sports (a lot), flying (virtual and real), photograph, be with friends, music, book, nature

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. 59th_Buncsi
    3sqn going alive again?
  2. 59th_Buncsi
    I don't remember where but I read it will be out in Q2 2025.
  3. 59th_Buncsi
    We had the 9.12B in Hungary. IFF and other changes were made after joining the NATO. And none of the operational Fulcrums had SPO-10. Neither hungarian nor other nation's.
  4. 59th_Buncsi started following 24.03.1999 - Mig-29 combat flight - Iljo Arizanov and 24.03.1999 - Mig-29 combat flight - Nebojša Nikolić
  5. 59th_Buncsi started following DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum
  6. 59th_Buncsi started following 06.04.1999 - Mig-29 combat flight - Boro Zoraja
  7. 59th_Buncsi
    I hope you guys are not going to migrate the 21bis 75AP into a 75A and delete the former. Or is that MiG-21 will be an update just like Heatblur gave the F-14A after the B?
  8. 59th_Buncsi
    2 of them are travel pods.
  9. 59th_Buncsi started following DCS MiG-29A
  10. 59th_Buncsi
    The upper intake louvers will flutter under certain circumstances. Like in knife flight, negative G load, or high alpha. I think in this case it was caused by the high alpha. Note, that also the leading edge flaps were in the out position.
  11. 59th_Buncsi
    It could carry 4, even though it didn't become standard.
  12. 59th_Buncsi
    Probably the easiest way is to look at the charts. https://dcs.silver.ru/Diagram/Mig29_2 https://dcs.silver.ru/Diagram/F15c
  13. 59th_Buncsi
    At this video this is an R-37, or am I mistaken?
  14. 59th_Buncsi
    Other than the fact that the customer is always right and being a customer of over 20 years of ED's product it still amazes me how some "minute bug" can be so obvious yet unnoticed. It's not about resources, I think everyone got that, it's more about being inattentive. And yes, I would say that to some ED's Testers too if it can go into release product. Since it is also being in released version, not only in open beta.
  15. 59th_Buncsi
    Pilot: - 59th_Buncsi Aircraft: - MiG-29A
  16. 59th_Buncsi
  17. 59th_Buncsi
    @Raven434th Well, we have to wait for the 6DOF cockpit...
  18. 59th_Buncsi
    I sat in a 29 a couple of times (only on the ground) but i can tell you, the vertical stabilizers and the wing is out of sight. You have to bow your head to right/left to be able to see the wings and the verticals. If you still dont believe me: http://album.reality.hu/OLD/panos/repnap/mig29_inst/ Note: The camera is in front and higher than you would sit. (And a bit on the right side.)
  19. 59th_Buncsi
    This is realistic, from ths view you cant see the wings. You have to bow your head a bit, but in this pit (2D and not 6DOF) you cant.
×
×
  • Create New...