Orao

How about giving you the name of retired pilots ??? It's much better than manuals. Besides France is changing for RAfale now and there shouldn't be any probelm about top secret bull s..t

It's a possible memory failure. Take out one memory stick, lunch the lockon and try, do the same thing with the second stick. If still crashes with only one stick then it's a lockon problem otherwise you are good for changing your memory stick.

Are you sure about this ??? In F-15C campaign I had no problem engaging with Aim-120C or having kill with it. I still prefer it to the AIM-7M. As for TWS AMRAAMS are heading for designated targets.

Sorry man I don't use them. It is killing my fps and I'm sure that evryone else except maybe few lucky asses who got ultranoch rig :) isn't using that setting neither.

Try putting some AI to se how it works with.

Damn 3 and 4 are unvailable now.

And for those who don't have edonkey nor emul ??? Can you uploaded it again ? Thx.

Yes. But the guy who will try to connect to your server should use this IP :70.111.76 to connect eventhough physicly speaking your servr is on this adress 192.168.1.100. Think of router as an immigration police. He can say who can enter and who can't and once the packet has entered it's being dispatched to the specific computer. And you you are the guy who writes the laws for router to be enforced.

Ip adress is the adress of your computer. Now what you need to do is to enter into the configuration page (read manual provided with your router for that) and go to the setup page. Open UDP and TCP port 10308. Afterwards you will have to forward those same ports. It means that whenever communication arrives at UDP/TCP port 10308 your router will send it directly to this IP adress IP Address: 192.168.1.100. All this should be in you setup page for router. You do same thing for Teamspeak.

I agree with you on your last sentence.

Yep but the surviability of pilots today in dogfight is much improved. So you can use same pilots for flying missions. The only factor of limitation would be the fact they can eject only 3 times. However in time of war the army will take guys which wouldn't have passed trials in peace time. Same thing happened during Battle of Britain. They were producing more planes than they had pilots. And many young pilots didn't match the criteria for being the fighter pilot in peace time but they flew in war time.

Can you say same thing for B-2 and F/A-117 ??? Those planes are the pure product of stealth technology and their numbers are kept to low. But that didn't help to develop faster and cheaper the F-22 program. Sorry but IMHO the F-22 is a fiasco and they keep it just to keep the election promises. And yes the numbers are all. One plane no matter how good it is can't cover the entire air space on its own, if you want total domination of the sky over battlefieled then you have to outnumber the adversary. WW2 showed you this. Germans had better planes but they lost the war to the allies because they were outnumbered. Russinas understood that long time ago and now they are building the planes that can be built quickly and that are reliable (well they still have improvements to make in electronics). Imagine the following situation. You have one squadron of F-22 against 3 sqds of Su-27. The F-22s will be able to wipe out at least two sqd of Su-27 during sinlge engagement but what will happen when they meet the third sqd of Su-27 ??? It will be their turn to get wiped out. And when you consider figures, one F-22 sqd costs much more than 2 Su-27 sqds. Reality is crude but that is the reality. Same thing goes for Rafale on french side. That plane is much more expensive than a single Su-27 or Mig-29.

I think that they are planing on including the infantery

Sorry to hurt your sensibility as far as F/A-18 is concerned but the US Navy pilots said that F-18 sux (and not just the kerozen). They have a choice between having more ordonance or extendig their operational radius which is pretty weired considering the fact that F/A-18 is operating from the carrier. Now concerning the financial problems of NAVY the US could have canceled the F-22 program (completly useless IMHO since there is no more Soviet Union and in all wars the US had absolute air control over the battlefield) and save the money for the NAVY, after all the NAVY is always first to fight and last to withdraw. Don't you agree with me on this one ?

F/A-18 sux that's all.

IRL the pilot of F/A-18 would had have to negociate with the airplane for his last manoeuvre. The on board computer calculates first if the input given by pilot is dangerous before executing it. If is dangerous the input would be ignored.

I've found this link on "check six" the french forums which deal with aviation and simulators. http://www.orionwarrior.com/files/TopGun727.mpg Iceman is inside.... Have a nice day.

New Link Ok guys I uploaded it to my web space so take it easy OK ???? http://goranmost78.free.fr/saf.avi