Jump to content

PatatOorlog

Members
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Flight Simulators
    DCS
  • Location
    Netherlands
  • Interests
    DCS, VR

Recent Profile Visitors

956 profile views
  1. 5900x 64gb 3600mhz 3090 OC Running on a m.2 Quick Mission on F18 Ground pound mission (bottom one) DxDiag.txt dcs.log dcs.20230310-155356.crash
  2. Doesnt matter on what the timer is, if your kinematic is bad the missile will have less range. If the target doesnt defend, the missile will have more range. Timer has nothing to do with this. And yes the lockon Fox 3 is quite better but still letting it use its own radar ( its a fox 3 lol?) its still the same. So please dont test it with lock on active capability. If i dont want to defend id use a FOX 1
  3. (Need Real World Evidence) Newy read the document. This material appeared in the April (#24) and October (#25) 2003 issues of the Naval SITREP Bibliography Radar Evaluation Handbook, Barton, Dr. David K., Artech House, 1991 Jane’s Weapons Systems series Jane’s Radar and Electronic Warfare series this are the resources they used it is on page 2 of the pdf NEW
  4. So after doing some homework after my speculation that the F16 radar is underpreforming in all aspects compared to its real life counterpart. I found some important data about how it should actually perform. (public data) Im just leaving this here for ED to check and validate. 1.pdf
  5. Here is some testing we did yesterday. Tacview and TRK is included https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1B1qEvD64ADCamMZ9PByPbJxQuJHS-vTs?usp=sharing Also please keep the topic on the current 120c problem, thats where this thread is made for.
  6. In addition to this post, i would like everyone to also give some attention to this post made by Archer Also please keep the topic on the current 120c problem, thats where this thread is made for (you know what to do) - PatatOorlog
  7. Agreed with all the points your making Archer. In addition to that i hope that they will give us some news soon regarding the future of the 120. If we really want to see PvP Improve there will be more things to improve and add than just fixing the missiles. PatatOorlog
  8. A good Idea might be to just make the rwrs inaccurate to the point where you cant notch reliably with them
  9. https://drive.google.com/file/d/15GyxPgbqHK0EaH5QH8GmphtgcWf1NIQr/view?usp=sharing
  10. Squadron: 18th Sparrows Aircraft: All Maps: Caucasus *We don’t preffer Marianas due to bad performance
  11. What these guys are saying is so true that it’s not even funny, turning cold inside 2 miles defeats the missile tbf I’d rather have the old patch for competitive, the current 120c is a meme
  12. Hey guys, So i fly the jeff on a daily basis and i would like to know what you guys think about whether or not this is realistic. My main questionable ability of the jeff is being able to have full control when still at 70 - 130 knots whilst pulling 32 - 40 aoa Here is a demonstration: JF 17 Is The Most Balanced UFO - YouTube Then i would also like to mention the snappiness on the rudder, its feeling like it always has full authority, no matter at what speed. I just find it weird, not really a bug report just a quick message whether or not this is realistic. if it is well so be it I attached a tacview ( Regular dogfight) Jeff.zip.acmi
×
×
  • Create New...