evanf117

Celebration Time

ah yes i see, if you could implement smoke rockets that would be awesome

i may be wrong but i believe the rockets could be fired individually from one another, also smoke rockets would be great for marking targets this is brilliant, ive been wanting more FAC aircraft in DCS for some time

Syria doesn't have a great wallpaper, seems that Ugra kinda skips over the wallpaper

that is so dumb its comical, because bombing terrorist's is bad somehow, and because DCS accurately representing a 60 year old helicopter is somehow going to lead to peoples deaths or spare their lives

we can remove the IR suppressor's, but id very much like to be able to remove the PZU's on the Hip and Hind this isnt true afaik, MVD mozdok uses Tv2's and they have nose guns if memory serves, and even if it isnt true, why not make the nose gun available anyway to those who enjoy fun

(Bug) helicopters set to uncontrolled or client and set to take off from ground cold or hot change location once a mission is saved to the nearest airport parking. making alot of missions unplayable after save (missing feature) destroyed vehicle's are removed when saving mission. they should be replaced with a static set to the dead state, other wise missions feel empty once units are killed and then the mission is saved and re-loaded save test Track.trk Save Test.mizSave Test out.miz

when i bought the Spitfire we were restricted to 250 or 500 lbs bombs, now we can carry both at the same time, the reason that the change was made was because people provided evidence, primarily photos, that this could and was done

it might be like the Su-47, there is only one Su-47, it is kept airworthy and used for testing of systems, such as it was a test bed for the Su-57's weapons bay, there may be some Ka-50's still flying for Karmov to use to test systems

F-5E's i believe, they were upgraded with their own radios and INS, hence the shark fin on the roof, as well as i believe their nose is shaped differently, i have seen at least one person saying that Swiss F-5's could carry and use 4 AIM-9's but i cannot confirm that info apparently ED is looking to bring the coms and INS to the F-5E, in spite of the fact that no one is asking for it, instead we are all asking for 4 Winders, AAR, RATO and Mav's i believe the Swiss F-5 was also RATO capable

as far as im aware our F-5E, being an F-5 that was sold to the Swiss and then bought back from them for aggressor's would have had the guns and radar removed, so i dont know why ED is trying this "realism" line when our F-5E still has a radar and functional guns

the Spitfires bomb load did not need more than a few pictures and that missile isn't painted as a CATM on the other hand, as far as im aware USAF aggressor F-5's didnt have guns or radars, so why dont we get the guns and radar removed from our F-5?

it was more me saying, "hey, if this is block spersificly you aren't getting 120D's" (in a way i hope it is block spersificly because i would love to see peoples shock, but realistically that isnt a good financial decision

if we get a 2B, and i hope we do, alot of people will be disappointed, i personally believe a frankenjet will be the likely outcome, and in such case i believe many people, including my self, will bring up the F-5E and its RATO, AAR, Mav's and such that could be added, and havent afaik, the AIM-120's on the 2B are C7's not (current in game)C5's or D's

yes it does, because the stated reason we cant have nice things is realism, and yet the F-35 is HUGE departure from realism, doesn't matter how you cut the cake, its still chocolate and cheese