Joe1978

Yes. Only in this map. In my case (tomcat), it's the worst-case scenario. Overall, my experience with the 4080S is much better. But as I said, I still notice that change at 900", although subtle at times, it's still present.

I am pleased that you are able to utilize it now. With the 4080S, I can feel/observe the "step" at 900 feet. It is not as pronounced, nor does it cause a significant FPS drop, but the transition remains noticeable, despite the developer's denial. Where I do still notice a very hard jerk is when I try to approach the carrier: for a few seconds the stuttering and jerking is brutal.

Thank you YoYo. In mi case, I tested the module without mods ( I don´t have the MIG 25p mod ) and with a DSC repair. Only after an update (Sorry, I don't remember the exact date) did the problem resolve itself.

RB just need to add this to its statement... jajajaja

Hi I just fix the mission 4 Issue related to the player's Viggen starting position. You can find it: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3337375/ PD: I couldn't find a specific thread for this campaign. Sorry if I duplicated it. joe AJS37-M04.miz

I don't want to give away any spoilers, but "The Pentagon Paradox..." is about how the end of the Tomcat comes and how the Navy and the Pentagon offices and lobbies rescue the McDonnell Douglas YF17. There are many good books about the F-14 (maybe not as many as on the F4). I personally like to the history, and specifically the First Gulf War (Iran/Iraq), since all my favorite aircraft were involved (F-14, F-4, F-5, Mirage F1, Mig-25, Mig-23, etc.), so I would recommend "Iranian F-14 Tomcat Units in Combat," but there are other books like "Tomcat! The Grumman F-14 Story" or "Grumman F-14 Tomcat." This is part of my library: Tomcat Alley Brown, David F. Tomcat! The Grumman F14 story Gillcrist, Paul T. Grumman F14 TomcatHolmes, Tony Iranian F-14 Tomcat Units in Combat: No. 49 (Combat Aircraft)Tom Cooper, Farzad Bishop In the Claws of the Tomcat: Us Navy F-14 Tomcat in Combat, 1987-2000Tom Cooper F-14 Tomcat Units in Operation: Iraqi Freedom No. 52 (Combat Aircraft)Charlotte & Peter Fiell F-14 Tomcat Units of Operation Enduring Freedom: No. 70 (Combat Aircraft)Tony Holmes F-14 Tomcat: Grumman's “Top Gun” from Vietnam to the Persian Gulf: 11David F. Brown F-14 Tomcat Pilot's Flight Operating Manual Vol. 1 United States Navy F-14 Tomcat Pilot's Flight Operating Manual Vol. 2 United States Navy Grumman F-14 Tomcat James Perry Stevenson

Excuse me, just a quick note on my comments: English is not my native language. My question is rhetorical... everyone should make the decision that best suits them, of course.

Without wanting to get into an argument, anything not available in the store or installed on a PC is just smoke and mirrors to me (F4u,Bo-135, Iranian Tomcat...). In this case, I've only mentioned RB since we're talking about them: obviously, we could talk about other modules, as you rightly point out, but that's not the case here. I agree with you. I buy a product and I'm not interested in the drama (I have only participated in these threads on two or three occasions)I'm interested only in the finished product and its maintenance, things that RB doesn't usually pay attention: Suddenly there is a problem between two companies and the flight model of the M2000 breaks, the radar of the F15 stops working... you mentioned the campaigns, for example: the ones that come with RB modules have been broken for years and have been reported countless times. As previously stated, my sole concern is the completion of I already or paid for. I am not interested their good intentions or future projects. joe

I hope I don't offend anyone but in case RB were to return, as a user, I would feel more comfortable if they finished EVERYTHING they have pending (starting with their oldest modules and of course, everything related to the F15) before selling us more "smoke": Mirage 2000D, Mig23, Prowler..... are just promises. After what happened, would you buy a RB module again? They have a lot of work to do and a lot of things to prove before selling us anything IMHO. I would have felt more confident if the real developers had moved away from RB and created their own 3rd party. Joe

Well, like you said... it depends. A Hornet can't carry those Harpoons, harms, etc... very far due to its limited range. I don't want to start a sterile discussion with this. James Perry Stevenson's book gives a good perspective on things.

I have been able to install it now without problems in saved game as Rudel. Thanks!!!!

Sabot, thank you very much for this mod. A question: I tried to install the mod in the recommended path (Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\Mods\aircraft\FW-190D9\Liveries\Cockpit_FW190D9) but my DCS doesn't read it. Any recommendations? Inside the Cockpit_FW190D9 folder I have another one called Default. Should I delete it?

Yes, both are very good books.

I recommend this book: "The Pentagon Paradox: Development of the F-18 Hornet" James Perry Stevenson