-
Posts
1059 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
-
When we are dealing with FMS one of the most important items would be navigation database. While in MSFS we have been using Navigraph for years, I am not sure what are the plans for this on this tittle. Most aircrafts that we do have in DCS until now did not used such kind of navigational databases. it is true that we do not have too many airports to service compared with MSFS numbers but still I do not think this has an easy solution in DCS, so I am eagerly looking forward to see how the development team has approached this
-
In the previous Anubis C-130J Mod we had the capability of loading, transporting air droping, LAPES or ground offloading vehicles and then drive them with Combined Arms. There was also a way to drop paratroopers with that mod. So I have great hopes with this payware module
-
Same here !!! Great memories and a lot of flying with that addon We already have a great selection of platforms to launch MK-X, GBU-X, AGM-X, AIM-X.... DCS also need to expand other roles and options and the Hercules and the Chinook are great platforms for that. The C-130 has always been one of my favourite aircrafts of all times so I am really happy to have the option to fly it in DCS.
-
This is the information available in the FAQ on ASC Discord
-
Thanks. This looks most useful ¡¡¡
-
Really awesome. A dream come true for DCE !! Thanks for the video
-
I would love to have this option. I do never touch a new aircraft without going through the manual. Having the manual even on its early state and missing sone future features would be most welcomed.
-
Purchased !! I have been waiting for a quality C-130 addon for long time !! Looking forward for its release !!
-
We do need the option to have CASE II when the appropiate meteorological conditions prevail. You can of course practice or fly missions the way you prefer but at this moment the existing build does not provide CASE II ATC when CASE II meteorological conditions exists unless you add rain that is not an element part of the CASE II criteria.
-
Although it does work this way, I am afraid that this is not the solution for the problem. Rain should not be as precondition for CASE II. It does not mention rain and if you remove the rain in our actual build of DCS there is no chance to get a CASE II so the bug remains. We should be able to get a CASE II. I am attaching a track where the carrier provides a CASE I acknowledging a "Solid layer at 2000 feet and visibility 6 miles" I have tried countless combinations and it simply goes from CASE I to CASE III but I have not been able to get a CASE II. Of course we could add rain but that may have an undesired effect in other aspects of the mission. We should be able to get a CASE II when the "official" CASE II conditions are met without the need of rain. Would be also great to give the editor the possibility of setting the carrier "CASE" condition through triggers so you can practice CASE II and III without having IMC conditions but it is just a wish. But currently we do have a bug where the carrier does not acknowledge properly the current meteorological condition criteria and unless you add rain or snow, there is no chance of CASE II. Please fix it! No CASE II.trk
-
Case II \ III - which weather conditions in DCS trigger each one?
Furia replied to BarTzi's topic in DCS: Supercarrier
I am unable to get a CASE II. I am attaching a track where the carrier provides a CASE I acknowledging a "Solid layer at 2000 feet and visibility 6 miles" I have tried countless combinations and it simply goes from CASE I to CASE III but I have not been able to get a CASE II If any one has a mission preferably in the Marianas with a CASE II scenario and could share it here I would highly appreciate that. No CASE II.trk -
Thanks Flappie. We wanted to used that ship in our next campaign but having only a single spawn spot is not working for us.
- 4 replies
-
- mp
- type 071 transport dock
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Any campaing where the management of AI wingman is not required?
Furia replied to Furia's topic in Baltic Dragon
Thanks Baltic Dragon and Colonel Akir. I think these campaings look awesome but sadly doing „anything“ with AI is not my gameplay. I bought the original Ravel One plus other authors campaings and is some cases I did not even finished mission one. I do understand that for most players and in line with realism there need to be AI flights and wingman but that is not for me. I know I am a minority here and I do not ask for any changes to the existing model I started this thread with the hope that there may be some campaings available that may not require AI Wingman. I have read all Kevin Miller books and I understand that to reproduce the whole story you need those AI wingman. No complains from my side but it is not how I like to play DCS. Thanks a lot for the prompt answer I believe those campaings are really awesome and with a huge creativity effort !! -
Any campaing where the management of AI wingman is not required?
Furia replied to Furia's topic in Baltic Dragon
Does anyone know if the last campaing from BD can also be played without playing without micromanaging the AI Wingmen as comented above? -
Any campaing where the management of AI wingman is not required?
Furia replied to Furia's topic in Baltic Dragon
Hi. Thanks a lot ! Very interesting and useful information thanks! I do not want to depend on the AI performance to complete a mision neither I want to spend time giving instructions to the AI wingman. As I mentioned I am not used to do that and that is not my playstyle. I like complex, demanding and "realistic" campaings as possible being well aware that single ship is not actually realistic. I am trying to avoid the F10 micromanagement of the AI and most important that I do not depend on the AI performance or lack of it to complete the mission. At thi moment I was looking for a F/A-18C Campaing preferably a naval one but based on your comment I am going to take a deeper look at Artic Thunder. Thanks!!