Germane

Yes

The guys are only excited what will come next from HB. Thats nothing bad. Its also nice for HB to see that the people are so hyped by there products.

Come on HB, the roadmap would be the perfect present for the weekend tomorrow

Heatblur, we are still waiting!

No no, we are just talking about more detailed clouds They have still the same shape for everyone and are still synchronized...they should just be less blurry. So you have absolutly no disadvantage with lower settings.

Good question. Ist today THE day?

Nothing will change. The clouds have still the same shape. They have only more details. Quite the contrary, you have an advantage with lower details because the visibility is better due to the lack of details. It is not only interesting for people with high end PCs. It is also a question of your priority. I think for a lot of players are the clouds in a flight sim more important than, for example, the shadows or grass. So you can decrease the one thing to increase the other. You have the coice.

Ah ok. So forget what I wrote ;). Nevertheless, I hope they are using the different settings to increase the graphic quality for people which are willing to pay for sharper clouds with a fps drop.

I think it is no problem for the power. I think its more a question of the contrast and coloring. When I look at pictures from the other big sim with the M, it has sharp clouds. I had also no problem if it costs performance. I mean thats the reason why we have graphic settings. At the moment are the differences betwen the settings not very big

+1 Absolutely! Thats also my big problem with the new clouds. They are to "soft" and blurry.

+1

But the post is only 3 days old. The roadmap must be already finished at this point...or not

A good question!

Hello, in the last newsletters ist the talk of pre calculated raytracing for the MI-24. Is there something also plant by HB to add for the F-14?

So ED please give us an update. What your plans with AAR? In my opinion it is a very important part of a military flight sim.

So ED, I would say it is time to give us an update of the current status Is it still plant and when get we any infos? Not harder...more realistic Oh I didnt know. Sounds interesting. Why was it removed?

Hallo together, is it planned to rework the air to air refuling, so that the basket/cable gets a real physik and collision system?

Hallo together, I have a question to the inlet ramps. In which situation should I stow them? Is there a scenario at all where it is usefull?

Hallo Golo, so it is a bug, or not? I checked it again. Nevertheless in which position the switch is, the fuel feed is always the same.

Thank you for your Feedback. Very interesting! I could ask tons of other questions

Thank you for your answer, Naquaii! Is it intented from HB to release a roadmap of planned system implementations in the next time? What I dont understand is, if only the ARC-182 can use DF, for what is the ADF function on the -159?

Other things which would be great if they got implemented are the ADF function of the ARC-159 or an overheating of the systems when the air source is set to off. I know things like these are not so spectaculate like a new plane but in my opinion they would give the F-14 even more depth and are also important.

Hello guys, first I want to say I m excited by the F14. It is a awesome module. It is so detailled simulated and makes a lot of fun to fly. I know the next big steps for you guys at Heatblure is to implement the other F-14A modells. But what would interest me is, what is with the "small" things? Is it planned to introduce the OBC or other things from the Master Test Panel like the EMERG GEN Test? And do you want to implement the curcuit breakers?

The fuel feed switch dont work. No matter which position is selected, the engines get always fuel from all tanks.