Jump to content

Germane

Members
  • Posts

    281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Germane

  1. This thread is intended to give VR newcomers a little orientation as to what the best IPD setting is for the respective aircraft. Getting into VR is confusing enough and this will at least give you an idea of the right size ratio for your aircraft. For some reason I don't understand, almost every aircraft is optimised to a different value. My settings are: F14: 61 F16: 55
  2. I hope the improvements will come with the next update. I am definetly very excited. But pleeeeeease work also on the rendering and the details of the clouds themselves! They are to blurry at the moment
  3. I hope so I am definitely excited and hope for a new benchmark.
  4. I just hope the DCS engine doesn't make it too hard for them. I'm afraid the engines they have worked with so far have been much more modern and flexible. But nevertheless I am very happy about the announcement.
  5. Interssting, thank you. The clarity of the varjo seems to be really impressiv
  6. I would be interested to know. With which Steam vr resolution of a G2 is the native image of the Varjo comparable?
  7. Does this also include that not all switches are always in the default position? That would be very cool and would give the checklist more sense
  8. Bomb mode is not shown on the wing sweep display
  9. Hey guys, well we know that we don't get any info until the official announcement just before release. So let's debate a little about what our hopes and wishes are for the module. Maybe one or the other will be adopted I would like to see the simulation of IFF (as in the JF-17) as well as the complex simulation of the avionics systems and the influence of environmental effects such as icing or canopy fogging. I would also like to see complex radar (I think the Mirage set a new standard here) and engine simulation. Personally, I would not need as much non-aircraft content as in the F14 (Forrestal, A-6, etc.). Rather more love and details for the aircraft itself. For example, a generator for the external air/power supply would be very cool (like it exists for the C-101). I hope that there will be many of these small and larger details. So guys, let's hear what you would like to see.
  10. So ED, what is the current status? I must say that it is a little disappointing that no update has come for over a year
  11. In this case, it is not quite so simple. In the "real" head position, the HUD displays are rendered incorrectly. They are only displayed correctly for the "low" position.
  12. I am already very excited about the pilot body. I wonder if it might be a bit confusing in VR, since the camera sits a bit lower than the actual head position.
  13. @NineLine @BIGNEWY Any comment? Are you working on it?
  14. I could not get used to it. This small change would massively improve the VR experience
  15. +1 Please ED. Any Info?
  16. Sounds great! Does the next patch already include the rework of the ACLS mode?
  17. It would be so great if we could go through more checklists with jester. Similar to the assistant startup. For taxi, take-off, landing....
  18. If the wings are not completely horizontal, there will be an abrupt downward movement when the GT mode is activated in conjunction with ALT HLD. This happens even with a minimum climb rate or with zero climb rate. And yes, its also beyond 450 KIAS. In addition, I noticed that the HDG mode does not seem to work. Can anyone confirm this?
  19. Any idea what they mean with visual improvements?
  20. Hmm, there may not be a way to get fuel into the tanks (wings and ext) but the option of which tanks to take fuel from. It is possible to choose whether fuel is taken from the central or external tanks first. So maybe also from which side?? That would be enough to compensate for an imbalance. Otherwise, I honestly don't see the point of the switch.
  21. What I still don't quite understand is. The manual talks about left and right tanks. But what is meant by this? Does this also include the wing tanks and external tanks? In order to compensate for an imbalance, that would make sense, wouldn't it?
  22. A 27 4k monitor has round about 105 ppd. The ppd of a G2 is between a 1280x720p and 640x480 resolution. Also a 30 ppd is far away from 1080p
  23. If you activate the ALT HLD or GT mode separately, the AP works fine, but if you activate the GT mode and the ALT HLD mode at the same time, there is a significant oscillation up and down. Similar before the revision of the autopilot. At the same time, I would like to thank you here for the excellent work of the AP.
  24. Yeah we need a lot more possibilities for adaptation.
×
×
  • Create New...