Bounti30

I must probably apply it incorrectly nothing happens

THANKS I'll try

where should we put texconv.exe Thanks

Thank you for this work But can you detail the procedure I am not experienced in the use of scripts and powersheel

No news of an update on performance issues ?

with the first point i agree with you. But I would have preferred more communication from ED rather than a simple "investigating" As for the fact that it is normal that as SIM upgrades progress, our systems become obsolete Personally I do not have the means to invest astronomicals sums in equipment in addition to the price of the different products I think it would be wise to take a break from the race for new things and optimize what already exists for my part I came back in 2.9.5.55918 and will not invest further without significant software improvements

I admire this entire community who are trying to find solutions. On the other hand, I am tired of having software that is less and less efficient with each update. And this despite the investment in ever more efficient equipment. DCS is the only program I have invested this much money into. Because like many people I am someone who would have wanted to be a pilot. but today I no longer enjoy flying. Without radical change, I am sadly considering stopping. What a waste

dcs 2.9.5.55918.log dcs 2.9.7.59263.log I noticed a double consumption of my GPU Does anyone have the same thing? everything is strictly identical except the DCS version I9 9900k, Asus prime A, 32Go DDR4, Win10, RTX 3090, SSD m2 for windows, SSD m2 for DCS

for my part I reverted to version 2.9.5.55918 later versions are unplayable question to ED what does investigating mean on their part, have they found ways to improve?

Hello ED. Since hand tracking is native to Oculus Quest, will it be integrated into DCS?

thanks ED, the pilot body looks amazing in VR. The immersion is great. No fps loss. Good work

I think ED is innocent in this case. Personally I don't let Quest 2 automatically update. I'm waiting for feedback. META may not even know that DCS has problems with V63. META does not care about third party software, they only develop their own products. If ED bothers to do a hotfix to fix the problem, thank you but they are not obligated.

My intervention was not clear. I don't think that ED is doing nothing, but that big changes are not in the future. Indeed, what will work for some will break for others. Small adjustments will be made but will not solve everything. To achieve this it would be necessary to standardize all computers, systems, drivers, etc. And that's impossible

I don't expect big changes in the futur, for ED multithreading is a success for the majority

No news on multithreading, vulkan or VR bugs ? Thanks

Thank you for your response and your interest in this subject. I understand your overall view of the system and I refrain from giving you advice. But you agree that DCS, and I repeat for myself is the best simulation, pushes the capabilities of computers. Are you not afraid that a certain part of the community will not be able to keep up without a real improvement in performance? Wouldn't that be detrimental to the future of DCS?

Yes, multithreaing was a step forward for DCS, but not successful, many problems persist. you just have to read all the topics. Solutions are often found by the community, which I thank. But I repeat it, without first finalizing the core of DCS functionalities such as moving grass, road traffic, clouds etc..., for many of them will be of no use if we cannot benefit from it. I would like to be able to put all the settings on full and go “Wow”. but the more the versions advance, the more the settings decrease. And the only way to overcome this fact for many is to invest in high-end equipment. I don't think I'm alone in thinking this.

I read all the ideas, I see common sense in many of them and I agree on many points. The expectations of some are not the same for others. But my opinion is that by adding layers of functionalities it will no longer be possible to transform the heart of DCS, and that developers will be facing a wall. I hope I'm wrong because DCS is the only simulation I use and I've tried many (I'm 51). It makes me think of a house where we add floors without consolidating the foundations, and one day everything collapses.

the point is to add functionality without upgrading the core of DCS. One day you won't be able to take the step anymore. Many are waiting for software improvements (Vulkan API etc....) but can ED do it? There is very little communication on the subject

I come back to my post after having lamented the forum for several days. actually I don't think that the hardware is at fault but the software itself. Many posts concerning mutlitrheading or the DCS graphics engine. Many users having problems despite having high-performance computers. So here is my question. Wouldn't it be wise for ED to stop escalating DCS functionality and instead address the root causes of dysfunction? Because personally I'm not interested in having photorealistic clouds or a hyper-detailed driver if the games run at 3 frames per second

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3090 CPU: Intel Core i9-9900K @ 4,9GHz RAM: 32GB DDR4 3200MHz VR: Quest2 HOTAS: Saitek X56 and rudder pedals

Thank you all for this topic. I disabled power service and since DCS 2.9 is much smoother, almost stutter free. My question, is it better to use optimal settings in power management or to disable it? THANKS better performance in fs2020 too

you think what you want, but it's a fact. I had better performance with my old hardware in 2.5 than today in 2.9 what I simply want to say is that I can get by with little to enjoy flying under DCS. (all my settings on medium because for me, speed counts above all) But the way things are going this will no longer be possible. To finish the initial question was addressed to ED, I wanted to know if the direction taken was to improve the core of the software itself or to make it grow infinitely in the hope that future hardware would follow suit. Nor see any aggression in my question.

I compare what I can compare, that is to say with my own equipment I moved from an i5 to an I9 from a 3070 to a 3090 time advances and it is more and more complicated to keep up with the equipment while keeping the same settings If I'm wrong I'm sorry