Falcon_S

It's really nonsensical to think that you're in a simulation with all this nonsense in it.

All of them. They are same - DCS F15C marked as PFM/AFM (whatever). That "massive damage" that you see it is only only cosmetics because all that "massive damaged" Egles have: - no problem to continue the fight - no problem to fire missiles - no problem to kill - no problem to maneuvering in close combat even "massive damaged" - need 2-3 more missiles to be destroyed and finally harmless - to be dead/destroyed if engine see it as dead and not to limping home, shoting missiles or go in dogfight... The only thing I'm trying to do in this conversation and every other about DCS F15c for years is to point out listed above. And instead of solving the problem, you're telling us here everything's okay.

It's a demagogy. Did you see F15c in video? Can you confirm to this auditorium here that all is fine with F15C in video?

Maybe... DCS F15C showtime: EDIT: ..and that famous IAF pilot was about 10miles from base. This dcs hero and his Eagle surpassed him for over 100+ miles.

It's been too long and I do not think it will change. There are no fuel leak effect also. Yesterday all the viewers and commentators on the Twitch mock this. ...The criteria are different, but I can say for myself - It would be embarrassing for me to fly persistent this NLO and in parallel present scientific facts here. At least it's funny to catch up with something that once happened (the question is how it happened and whether it happened at all,... only once dit happen, and again if it happened) as a fact justifying the anomaly which we see every day in this _World. Since I started with FC1.12 until today this topic about F15C is up to date. So, nothing spectacularly changed for my 10 years in this sim on this issue. :doh:

Yes, ReShade recommended. Today updated on 3.2.2, works nice.

If they find out that every DCS F15C pilot can found and maintain this very narrow margin of control they would commit a collective suicide.

Why admins not split many threads about this problem?

Return To Search command is not set in keyboard column. Result: Unlock target not work. I add "backspace" again and work. Is there reason for empty keyboard field or? I ask because many people that use Return To Search = Backspace in their profiles will not be even aware of the problem... just can`t unlock target. I almost did not report the bug: Return To Search - unlock target not work. It looked exactly like that.

Is ON by default... no more option to turn it oFF.

In su33 tooo too quiet... :(

They exist in "Tracks" folder only if you click on "save track" after quit/exit from mission.

However... i changed aircraft and orbit work.

In your first mission TYPE: A10C but in mission is MiG29A and not ORBIT ... check mission After edit mission, TYPE: A10C ...A10C is in mission and ORBIT Same problem is in second mission. Check attachment. Something is worng in mission. Fighter symbol are on the map, fighter is in mission but selected TYPE is A10C

Good job!

too much coffee :D

Ok, USA success. (I'm thinking like Russia) ;)

Use more than 100 missiles to make only 2-3 hits (CIVILIAN objects) and declare it a success - It's crazy.

71+ Of those 32, most of them hit the sand... :music_whistling: NATO likes to show destroyed targets but has not yet announced anything specifically. Strange? :megalol:

https://tvzvezda.ru/news/vstrane_i_mire/content/201804141321-62ir.htm

So. without S-300 they shot down about 70%. :thumbup: NATO were doomed to failure in advance.

Maybe you should... many detailed information. :music_whistling: Because ...but

I agree ... that's what I thought when I said:"Another reason to check.." ( i mean "One more reason...) I did not want it to look like a direct comparison. I wanted to say that Su27 has no problem with the limiter. It works impeccably. Su33 has it, but it allows us to cross the limits. That's why I think something is wrong. The purpose of the limiters is to stop us.

Maybe... Another reason to check and make corrections.