Jump to content

Wolverine

Members
  • Posts

    248
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Wolverine

  1. There's your problem. You are letting emotions get it the way. Just stop.
  2. Dear God people, you are making a mountain out of a molehill. If OP used the search function he would have learned that the Litening pod was a stopgap between us having to enter co-ordinates of targets manually and the ATFIR pod. There is no "betrayal" of the community nor any "burning of bridges". Stop trying to make this a controversy and stop acting like spoilt children.
  3. It's not just Kaspersky reporting edCore.dll Zonelabs is reporting edCore.dll as ransomware.
  4. But their whinning will fall on deaf ears as they will not have any evidence to prove that the Su-27S has this capability (because it doesn't). Unlike the MiG, where there was a video posted on these forums back in 2006 showing this ability.
  5. Many are forgetting though that the 25T is no longer a part of FC3 and is included with DCS world. The 25T can (and probably will) be worked on at a later date and isn't tied to any deadline involving FC3
  6. Not necessarily. ;) There is also a track floating about the forum of said drunken night landing on the Kuz.
  7. Sweet. I think I will have to reproduce my Su-25T/Kuznetsov night landing in rough weather/seas while drunk.... :pilotfly: :lol:
  8. Edit : All ok now :)
  9. Still no joy... This is getting frustrating. :protest:
  10. The version on the site is 1.2.0 This is the newer version, un-install the old one and install the new version + new modules.
  11. People actually believes "Britains Faux News"? Any credible sources? Their video doesn't show anything that their report claims. BTW, there is nothing "military or aviation aspect" to that report, just the usual one sided, right winged claptrap from the owner of faux news. So why is it here?
  12. Even if it was shot down, like I suspect, they are not going to admit it anyway. Too much of a propaganda coup for Libya. Nice to hear that the Pilot and WSO was picked up ok, hopefully without any injuries.
  13. As I explained in this thread, unless this has changed, there is no way that ED could release a Hi-Fi F/A-18 module for DCS. Next module for DCS should be the F-16C AFAIK. Cockpit screenie looked like a Block 42 variant according to viper buffs.
  14. Unless the docs that ED need from the navy (A1-F18AE-TAC-010 to be exact) have been declassified or EDs strict realism standards have fallen I wouldn't be holding my breath for an F/A-18 or any other US navy aircraft for that matter. Though if something has slipped under my radar since then on this topic do please enlighten me. Source Since Wags was quoted that the next release would be a US fixed wing aircraft it would be my understanding that the next DCS module would be the F-16 since the newer 3d model was posted here about a year ago (with the AH-64A cockpit model) and because they have all the documentation they need for it.
  15. Bud, The Release version was 1.1.0.5. Looks like the version you have, listed in your other thread, you are still flying on a beta version instead of the release version
  16. Nice to see that not only was this warning ignored but that the last few pages have been nothing but politics (and even advocating sexual abuse). :huh: Suppose its all ok though as the political posts allowed to remain are pro-western-US claptrap... :disgust: Rules for one appear to be lacking for others.....
  17. When playing single player, there are no cheats whatsoever. Only personal choice.
  18. oops, wrong thread.
  19. To make the Su-25T into a Su-25UTG takes a bit more than a hook and a skin, it would also take the removal of the cannon and all other weapons systems. The Su-25UTG was a low cost carrier landing training aid for budding Su-33 pilots, not a combat aircraft. The only thing that the pylons can carry is fuel tanks, nothing else. The only thing it has in common with the Su-25T is its low numbers, atm the is 6 25Ts and 10 Su-25UTGs (of those only 3 are original UTGs, the rest are rebuilt Su-25UBs). Originally there were 10 units in the Soviet airforce but during the break-up Russia got 5 and Ukraine got the other 5.
  20. root file is the location of your BS install e.g. C:\Eagle Dynamics\Ka-50 You going to far when you locate C:\Eagle Dynamics\Ka-50\BIN\X86\STABLE
  21. 2 of these problems I addressed over on the lockonfiles thread. these were; 1, The F-15C cockpit does not have an air to ground mode. it would be best to use a Ru Cockpit instead, perhaps the MiG-29G for its imperial HUD but afaik that brings up problems in deploying mavericks. 2, When using the A-10A cockpit for the harrier not only is its speed reduced but it cannot drop ordinance. The use of the Su-25T solves these problems somewhat.
  22. Yep, I'll make it a separate add-on though, so that its not included in the "original" flyable expanded loadouts for peeps that don't want it/don't use efA type mods
  23. Thank you for the suggestion/link. I will have a look at it and see what could be done. As you say, the bombers don't need to be checked especially the Su-25/25T which will drop ordinance that's not "hard coded" to it (Pity we couldn't do the same for the other airframes). Only down side I could see in that case is that some of the fighters load-outs are woeful also, but I'll see what I can do.
×
×
  • Create New...